Set Covering with Our Eyes Wide Shut
Anupam Gupta, Gregory Kehne, Roie Levin
Abstract
In the stochastic set cover problem (Grandoni et al., FOCS '08), we are given a collection S of m sets over a universe U of size N , and a distribution D over elements of U. The algorithm draws n elements one-by-one from D and must buy a set to cover each element on arrival; the goal is to minimize the total cost of sets bought during this process. A universal algorithm a-priori maps each element u ∈ U to a set S(u) such that if U ⊆ U is formed by drawing n times from distribution D, then the algorithm commits to outputting S(U ). Grandoni et al. gave an O(log mN )-competitive universal algorithm for this stochastic set cover problem.
We improve unilaterally upon this result by giving a simple, polynomial time O(log mn)competitive universal algorithm for the more general prophet version, in which U is formed by drawing from n different distributions D 1 , . . . , D n . Furthermore, we show that we do not need full foreknowledge of the distributions: in fact, a single sample from each distribution suffices. We show similar results for the 2-stage prophet setting and for the online-with-a-sample setting.
We obtain our results via a generic reduction from the single-sample prophet setting to the random-order setting; this reduction holds for a broad class of minimization problems that includes all covering problems. We take advantage of this framework by giving random-order algorithms for non-metric facility location and set multicover; using our framework, these automatically translate to universal prophet algorithms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e5fe7ff4-b581-47b6-93a8-4d0dd60e6d55Cited by top-tier papers2
- Online Combinatorial Optimization with Graphical DependenciesZhimeng Gao, Evangelia Gergatsouli, Kalen Patton, Sahil SinglaSTOC 2026 · 2 citations
- Approximating Asymmetric A Priori TSP beyond the Adaptivity GapManuel Christalla, Luise Puhlmann, Vera TraubSODA 2026
Builds on6
- Competitive Analysis with a Sample and the Secretary ProblemHaim Kaplan, David Naori, Danny RazSODA 2020 · 26 citations
- Learning from a Sample in Online AlgorithmsC. J. Argue, Alan M. Frieze, Anupam Gupta, Christopher SeilerNeurIPS 2022 · 16 citations
- Online Weighted Matching with a SampleHaim Kaplan, David Naori, Danny RazSODA 2022 · 14 citations
- Order Selection Prophet Inequality: From Threshold Optimization to Arrival Time DesignBo Peng, Zhihao Gavin TangFOCS 2022 · 12 citations
- Random Order Online Set Cover is as Easy as OfflineAnupam Gupta, Gregory Kehne, Roie LevinFOCS 2021 · 8 citations
Related papers
- Prophet Secretary and Matching: the Significance of the Largest ItemZiyun Chen, Zhiyi Huang, Dongchen Li, Zhihao Gavin TangSODA 2025 · 1 citation
- Prophet Inequalities Require Only a Constant Number of SamplesAndrés Cristi, Bruno ZiliottoSTOC 2024 · 6 citations
- Online Algorithms with Multiple PredictionsKeerti Anand, Rong Ge, Amit Kumar, Debmalya PanigrahiICML 2022 · 39 citations
- Stronger adversaries grow cheaper forests: online node-weighted Steiner problemsSander Borst, Marek Eliás, Moritz VenzinSODA 2025 · 1 citation
- Prophet Inequality from Samples: Is the More the Merrier?Tomer EzraSODA 2026 · 1 citation
