Safe Online Bid Optimization with Return on Investment and Budget Constraints
Matteo Castiglioni, Alessandro Nuara, Giulia Romano, Giorgio Spadaro, Francesco Trovò, Nicola Gatti
Abstract
In online marketing, the advertisers aim to balance achieving high volumes and high profitability. The companies' business units address this tradeoff by maximizing the volumes while guaranteeing a minimum Return On Investment (ROI) level. Such a task can be naturally modeled as a combinatorial optimization problem subject to ROI and budget constraints that can be solved online. In this picture, the learner's uncertainty over the constraints' parameters plays a crucial role since the algorithms' exploration choices might lead to their violation during the entire learning process. Such violations represent a major obstacle to adopting online techniques in real-world applications. Thus, controlling the algorithms' exploration during learning is paramount to making humans trust online learning tools. This paper studies the nature of both optimization and learning problems. In particular, we show that the learning problem is inapproximable within any factor (unless P = NP) and provide a pseudo-polynomial-time algorithm to solve its discretized version. Subsequently, we prove that no online learning algorithm can violate the (ROI or budget) constraints a sublinear number of times during the learning process while guaranteeing a sublinear regret. We provide the GCB algorithm that guarantees sublinear regret at the cost of a linear number of constraint violations and GCB safe that guarantees w.h.p. a constant upper bound on the number of constraint violations at the cost of a linear regret. Moreover, we designed GCB safe (𝜓, 𝜙), which guarantees both sublinear regret and safety w.h.p. at the cost of accepting tolerances 𝜓 and 𝜙 in the satisfaction of the ROI and budget constraints, respectively. Finally, we provide experimental results to compare the regret and constraint violations of GCB, GCB safe , and GCB safe (𝜓, 𝜙).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ff21203a-b879-479f-9fd5-7d3d499f91f7Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- Dual Mirror Descent for Online Allocation ProblemsSantiago R. Balseiro, Haihao Lu, Vahab S. MirrokniICML 2020 · 102 citations
- Auction Design for ROI-Constrained BuyersNegin Golrezaei, Ilan Lobel, Renato Paes LemeWWW 2021 · 55 citations
- Online Bidding Algorithms for Return-on-Spend Constrained Advertisers✱Zhe Feng, Swati Padmanabhan, Di WangWWW 2023 · 38 citations
- Multi-channel Autobidding with Budget and ROI ConstraintsYuan Deng, Negin Golrezaei, Patrick Jaillet, Jason Cheuk Nam Liang et al.ICML 2023 · 34 citations
Related papers
- Online Bidding under RoS Constraints without Knowing the ValueSushant Vijayan, Zhe Feng, Swati Padmanabhan, Karthikeyan Shanmugam et al.WWW 2025 · 4 citations
- Online Learning under Budget and ROI Constraints via Weak AdaptivityMatteo Castiglioni, Andrea Celli, Christian KroerICML 2024 · 12 citations
- A Unifying Framework for Online Optimization with Long-Term ConstraintsMatteo Castiglioni, Andrea Celli, Alberto Marchesi, Giulia Romano et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 59 citations
- Learning Safe Strategies for Value Maximizing Buyers in Uniform Price AuctionsNegin Golrezaei, Sourav SahooICML 2025
- Online Learning with Unknown ConstraintsKarthik Sridharan, Seung Won Wilson YooICML 2025
