Learning Safe Strategies for Value Maximizing Buyers in Uniform Price Auctions
Negin Golrezaei, Sourav Sahoo
Abstract
We study the bidding problem in repeated uniform price multi-unit auctions from the perspective of a single value-maximizing buyer who aims to maximize their cumulative value over T rounds while adhering to return-on-investment (RoI) constraints in each round. Buyers adopt m-uniform bidding format, where they submit m bid-quantity pairs (b i , q i ) to demand q i units at bid b i . We introduce safe bidding strategies as those that satisfy RoI constraints in every auction, regardless of competing bids. We show that these strategies depend only on the bidder's valuation curve, and the bidder can focus on a finite subset of this class without loss of generality. While the number of strategies in this subset is exponential in m, we develop a polynomial-time algorithm to learn the optimal safe strategy that achieves sublinear regret in the online setting, where regret is measured against a clairvoyant benchmark that knows the competing bids a priori and selects a fixed hindsight optimal safe strategy. We then evaluate the performance of safe strategies against a clairvoyant that selects the optimal strategy from a richer class of strategies in the online setting. In this scenario, we compute the richness ratio, α ∈ (0, 1] for the class of strategies chosen by the clairvoyant and show that our algorithm, designed to learn safe strategies, achieves α-approximate sublinear regret against these stronger benchmarks. Experiments on semi-synthetic data from real-world auctions show that safe strategies substantially outperform the derived theoretical bounds, making them quite appealing in practice.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bd681911-c964-40f9-b4d2-4a8af2107a37Builds on12
- Robust Auction Design in the Auto-bidding WorldSantiago R. Balseiro, Yuan Deng, Jieming Mao, Vahab S. Mirrokni et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 95 citations
- Towards Efficient Auctions in an Auto-bidding WorldYuan Deng, Jieming Mao, Vahab S. Mirrokni, Song ZuoWWW 2021 · 87 citations
- Auction Design for ROI-Constrained BuyersNegin Golrezaei, Ilan Lobel, Renato Paes LemeWWW 2021 · 55 citations
- Online Bidding Algorithms for Return-on-Spend Constrained Advertisers✱Zhe Feng, Swati Padmanabhan, Di WangWWW 2023 · 38 citations
- Multi-channel Autobidding with Budget and ROI ConstraintsYuan Deng, Negin Golrezaei, Patrick Jaillet, Jason Cheuk Nam Liang et al.ICML 2023 · 34 citations
Related papers
- No-Regret Online Autobidding Algorithms in First-price AuctionsYilin Li, Yuan Deng, Wei Tang, Hanrui ZhangNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- No-Regret Algorithms in non-Truthful Auctions with Budget and ROI ConstraintsGagan Aggarwal, Giannis Fikioris, Mingfei ZhaoWWW 2025 · 13 citations
- Prior-independent Dynamic Auctions for a Value-maximizing BuyerYuan Deng, Hanrui ZhangNeurIPS 2021 · 8 citations
- Learning and Collusion in Multi-unit AuctionsSimina Brânzei, Mahsa Derakhshan, Negin Golrezaei, Yanjun HanNeurIPS 2023 · 12 citations
- Comparing Uniform Price and Discriminatory Multi-Unit Auctions through Regret MinimizationMarius Potfer, Vianney PerchetNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
