Robust Auction Design in the Auto-bidding World
Santiago R. Balseiro, Yuan Deng, Jieming Mao, Vahab S. Mirrokni, Song Zuo
Abstract
In classic auction theory, reserve prices are known to be effective for improving revenue for the auctioneer against quasi-linear utility maximizing bidders. The introduction of reserve prices, however, usually do not help improve total welfare of the auctioneer and the bidders. In this paper, we focus on value maximizing bidders with return on spend constraints -- a paradigm that has drawn considerable attention recently as more advertisers adopt auto-bidding algorithms in advertising platforms -- and show that the introduction of reserve prices has a novel impact on the market. Namely, by choosing reserve prices appropriately the auctioneer can improve not only the total revenue but also the total welfare. Our results also demonstrate that reserve prices are robust to bidder types, i.e., reserve prices work well for different bidder types, such as value maximizers and utility maximizers, without using bidder type information. We generalize these results for a variety of auction mechanisms such as VCG, GSP, and first-price auctions. Moreover, we show how to combine these results with additive boosts to improve the welfare of the outcomes of the auction further. Finally, we complement our theoretical observations with an empirical study confirming the effectiveness of these ideas using data from online advertising auctions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d82f867c-40fb-4970-bb66-92e4ea99e233Cited by top-tier papers25
- Online Bidding Algorithms for Return-on-Spend Constrained Advertisers✱Zhe Feng, Swati Padmanabhan, Di WangWWW 2023 · 38 citations
- Multi-channel Autobidding with Budget and ROI ConstraintsYuan Deng, Negin Golrezaei, Patrick Jaillet, Jason Cheuk Nam Liang et al.ICML 2023 · 34 citations
- How and Why to Manipulate Your Own Agent: On the Incentives of Users of Learning AgentsYoav Kolumbus, Noam NisanNeurIPS 2022 · 28 citations
- Efficiency of the Generalized Second-Price Auction for Value MaximizersYuan Deng, Mohammad Mahdian, Jieming Mao, Vahab Mirrokni et al.WWW 2024 · 11 citations
- Posted Pricing and Dynamic Prior-independent Mechanisms with Value MaximizersYuan Deng, Vahab Mirrokni, Hanrui ZhangNeurIPS 2022 · 11 citations
Builds on7
- Dual Mirror Descent for Online Allocation ProblemsSantiago R. Balseiro, Haihao Lu, Vahab S. MirrokniICML 2020 · 102 citations
- Regularized Online Allocation Problems: Fairness and BeyondSantiago R. Balseiro, Haihao Lu, Vahab S. MirrokniICML 2021 · 67 citations
- Auction Design for ROI-Constrained BuyersNegin Golrezaei, Ilan Lobel, Renato Paes LemeWWW 2021 · 55 citations
- Stochastic bandits for multi-platform budget optimization in online advertisingVashist Avadhanula, Riccardo Colini-Baldeschi, Stefano Leonardi, Karthik Abinav Sankararaman et al.WWW 2021 · 43 citations
- The Parity Ray Regularizer for Pacing in Auction MarketsAndrea Celli, Riccardo Colini-Baldeschi, Christian Kroer, Eric SodomkaWWW 2022 · 19 citations
Related papers
- Towards Efficient Auctions in an Auto-bidding WorldYuan Deng, Jieming Mao, Vahab S. Mirrokni, Song ZuoWWW 2021 · 87 citations
- Individual Welfare Guarantees in the Autobidding World with Machine-learned AdviceYuan Deng, Negin Golrezaei, Patrick Jaillet, Jason Cheuk Nam Liang et al.WWW 2024 · 11 citations
- Utility Maximizer or Value Maximizer: Mechanism Design for Mixed Bidders in Online AdvertisingHongtao Lv, Zhilin Zhang, Zhenzhe Zheng, Jinghan Liu et al.AAAI 2023 · 10 citations
- Coupon Design in Advertising SystemsWeiran Shen, Pingzhong Tang, Xun Wang, Yadong Xu et al.AAAI 2021 · 5 citations
- On the Coordination of Value-Maximizing BiddersYanru Guan, Jiahao Zhang, Zhe Feng, Tao LinICML 2026
