Settling the Variance of Multi-Agent Policy Gradients
Jakub Grudzien Kuba, Muning Wen, Linghui Meng, Shangding Gu, Haifeng Zhang, David Mguni, Jun Wang, Yaodong Yang
Abstract
Policy gradient (PG) methods are popular reinforcement learning (RL) methods where a baseline is often applied to reduce the variance of gradient estimates. In multi-agent RL (MARL), although the PG theorem can be naturally extended, the effectiveness of multi-agent PG (MAPG) methods degrades as the variance of gradient estimates increases rapidly with the number of agents. In this paper , we offer a rigorous analysis of MAPG methods by, firstly, quantifying the contributions of the number of agents and agents' explorations to the variance of MAPG estimators. Based on this analysis, we derive the optimal baseline (OB) that achieves the minimal variance. In comparison to the OB, we measure the excess variance of existing MARL algorithms such as vanilla MAPG and COMA. Considering using deep neural networks, we also propose a surrogate version of OB, which can be seamlessly plugged into any existing PG methods in MARL. On benchmarks of Multi-Agent MuJoCo and StarCraft challenges, our OB technique effectively stabilises training and improves the performance of multi-agent PPO and COMA algorithms by a significant margin. Code is released at https://github.com/morning9393/ Optimal-Baseline-for-Multi-agent-Policy-Gradients .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fe985dd6-8335-4800-9999-e05f8a379ca9Cited by top-tier papers13
- Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning is a Sequence Modeling ProblemMuning Wen, Jakub Grudzien Kuba, Runji Lin, Weinan Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 408 citations
- Trust Region Policy Optimisation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningJakub Grudzien Kuba, Ruiqing Chen, Muning Wen, Ying Wen et al.ICLR 2022 · 367 citations
- ACE: Cooperative Multi-Agent Q-learning with Bidirectional Action-DependencyChuming Li, Jie Liu, Yinmin Zhang, Yuhong Wei et al.AAAI 2023 · 38 citations
- Reinforcing LLM Agents via Policy Optimization with Action DecompositionMuning Wen, Ziyu Wan, Jun Wang, Weinan Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 31 citations
- A Stochastic Linearized Augmented Lagrangian Method for Decentralized Bilevel OptimizationSongtao Lu, Siliang Zeng, Xiaodong Cui, Mark S. Squillante et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 29 citations
Builds on3
- Bi-Level Actor-Critic for Multi-Agent CoordinationHaifeng Zhang, Weizhe Chen, Zeren Huang, Minne Li et al.AAAI 2020 · 113 citations
- Multi-Agent Determinantal Q-LearningYaodong Yang, Ying Wen, Jun Wang, Liheng Chen et al.ICML 2020 · 83 citations
- Learning in Nonzero-Sum Stochastic Games with PotentialsDavid Henry Mguni, Yutong Wu, Yali Du, Yaodong Yang et al.ICML 2021 · 51 citations
Related papers
- DOP: Off-Policy Multi-Agent Decomposed Policy GradientsYihan Wang, Beining Han, Tonghan Wang, Heng Dong et al.ICLR 2021 · 208 citations
- Beyond Variance Reduction: Understanding the True Impact of Baselines on Policy OptimizationWesley Chung, Valentin Thomas, Marlos C. Machado, Nicolas Le RouxICML 2021 · 35 citations
- Optimistic Multi-Agent Policy GradientWenshuai Zhao, Yi Zhao, Zhiyuan Li, Juho Kannala et al.ICML 2024 · 7 citations
- On Many-Actions Policy GradientMichal Nauman, Marek CyganICML 2023 · 1 citation
- Revisiting Some Common Practices in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningWei Fu, Chao Yu, Zelai Xu, Jiaqi Yang et al.ICML 2022 · 49 citations
