Beyond Variance Reduction: Understanding the True Impact of Baselines on Policy Optimization
Wesley Chung, Valentin Thomas, Marlos C. Machado, Nicolas Le Roux
Abstract
Policy gradients methods are a popular and effective choice to train reinforcement learning agents in complex environments. The variance of the stochastic policy gradient is often seen as a key quantity to determine the effectiveness of the algorithm. Baselines are a common addition to reduce the variance of the gradient, but previous works have hardly ever considered other effects baselines may have on the optimization process. Using simple examples, we find that baselines modify the optimization dynamics even when the variance is the same. In certain cases, a baseline with lower variance may even be worse than another with higher variance. Furthermore, we find that the choice of baseline can affect the convergence of natural policy gradient, where certain baselines may lead to convergence to a suboptimal policy for any stepsize. Such behaviour emerges when sampling is constrained to be done using the current policy and we show how decoupling the sampling policy from the current policy guarantees convergence for a much wider range of baselines. More broadly, this work suggests that a more careful treatment of stochasticity in the updates---beyond the immediate variance---is necessary to understand the optimization process of policy gradient algorithms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3db4770c-ffa7-48c2-8695-bd3814189564Cited by top-tier papers13
- The Role of Baselines in Policy Gradient OptimizationJincheng Mei, Wesley Chung, Valentin Thomas, Bo Dai et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 34 citations
- On Proximal Policy Optimization's Heavy-tailed GradientsSaurabh Garg, Joshua Zhanson, Emilio Parisotto, Adarsh Prasad et al.ICML 2021 · 32 citations
- Understanding the Effect of Stochasticity in Policy OptimizationJincheng Mei, Bo Dai, Chenjun Xiao, Csaba Szepesvári et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 24 citations
- Averaging n-step Returns Reduces Variance in Reinforcement LearningBrett Daley, Martha White, Marlos C. MachadoICML 2024 · 7 citations
- Stochastic Gradient Succeeds for BanditsJincheng Mei, Zixin Zhong, Bo Dai, Alekh Agarwal et al.ICML 2023 · 6 citations
Builds on4
- On the Global Convergence Rates of Softmax Policy Gradient MethodsJincheng Mei, Chenjun Xiao, Csaba Szepesvári, Dale SchuurmansICML 2020 · 349 citations
- Provably Efficient Exploration in Policy OptimizationQi Cai, Zhuoran Yang, Chi Jin, Zhaoran WangICML 2020 · 304 citations
- PC-PG: Policy Cover Directed Exploration for Provable Policy Gradient LearningAlekh Agarwal, Mikael Henaff, Sham M. Kakade, Wen SunNeurIPS 2020 · 126 citations
- Optimistic Policy Optimization with Bandit FeedbackLior Shani, Yonathan Efroni, Aviv Rosenberg, Shie MannorICML 2020 · 100 citations
Related papers
- Posterior Value Functions: Hindsight Baselines for Policy Gradient MethodsChris Nota, Philip S. Thomas, Bruno C. da SilvaICML 2021 · 6 citations
- Stabilizing Policy Gradient Methods via Reward ProfilingShihab Ahmed, El Houcine Bergou, Yue Wang, Aritra DuttaAAAI 2026
- Settling the Variance of Multi-Agent Policy GradientsJakub Grudzien Kuba, Muning Wen, Linghui Meng, Shangding Gu et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 121 citations
- Doubly Optimal Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement LearningShuze Daniel Liu, Claire Chen, Shangtong ZhangICLR 2025
- Robust Reinforcement Learning via Adversarial training with Langevin DynamicsParameswaran Kamalaruban, Yu-Ting Huang, Ya-Ping Hsieh, Paul Rolland et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 75 citations
