Reinforcing LLM Agents via Policy Optimization with Action Decomposition
Muning Wen, Ziyu Wan, Jun Wang, Weinan Zhang, Ying Wen
Abstract
Language models as intelligent agents push the boundaries of sequential decision-making agents but struggle with limited knowledge of environmental dynamics and exponentially huge action space. Recent efforts like GLAM and TWOSOME manually constrain the action space to a restricted subset and employ reinforcement learning to align agents’ knowledge with specific environments. However, they overlook fine-grained credit assignments for intra-action tokens, which is essential for efficient language agent optimization, and rely on human’s prior knowledge to restrict action space. This paper proposes decomposing language agent optimization from the action level to the token level, offering finer supervision for each intra-action token and manageable optimization complexity in environments with unrestricted action spaces. Beginning with the simplification of flattening all actions, we theoretically explore the discrepancies between action-level optimization and this naive token-level optimization. We then derive the Bellman backup with Action Decomposition (BAD) to integrate credit assignments for both intra-action and inter-action tokens, effectively eliminating the discrepancies. Implementing BAD within the PPO algorithm, we introduce Policy Optimization with Action Decomposition (POAD). POAD benefits from a finer-grained credit assignment process and lower optimization complexity, leading to enhanced learning efficiency and generalization abilities in aligning language agents with interactive environments. We validate POAD across diverse testbeds, with results affirming the advantages of our approach and the correctness of our theoretical analysis 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a5972188-784e-44a4-8147-d4a019dd7a6aCited by top-tier papers15
- Group-in-Group Policy Optimization for LLM Agent TrainingLang Feng, Zhenghai Xue, Tingcong Liu, Bo AnNeurIPS 2025 · 484 citations
- Agentic Reinforced Policy OptimizationGuanting Dong, Hangyu Mao, Kai Ma, Licheng Bao et al.ICLR 2026 · 146 citations
- Heterogeneous Swarms: Jointly Optimizing Model Roles and Weights for Multi-LLM SystemsShangbin Feng, Zifeng Wang, Palash Goyal, Yike Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 26 citations
- RAT: Adversarial Attacks on Deep Reinforcement Agents for Targeted BehaviorsFengshuo Bai, Runze Liu, Yali Du, Ying Wen et al.AAAI 2025 · 15 citations
- Repurposing Synthetic Data for Fine-grained Search Agent SupervisionYida Zhao, Kuan Li, Xixi Wu, Liwen Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
Builds on28
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
Related papers
- True Knowledge Comes from Practice: Aligning Large Language Models with Embodied Environments via Reinforcement LearningWeihao Tan, Wentao Zhang, Shanqi Liu, Longtao Zheng et al.ICLR 2024 · 33 citations
- AT²PO: Agentic Turn-based Policy Optimization via Tree SearchZefang Zong, Dingwei Chen, Yang Li, Qi Yi et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
- DEPO: Dual-Efficiency Preference Optimization for LLM AgentsSirui Chen, Mengshi Zhao, Lei Xu, Yuying Zhao et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Towards Pareto-Optimal Tool-Integrated Agents with Pareto Ranking Policy OptimizationJunyi Li, Xiaowei Qian, Yingyi Zhang, Wenlin Zhang et al.ICML 2026
- Milestone-Guided Policy Learning for Long-Horizon Language AgentsZixuan Wang, Yuchen Yan, Hongxing Li, Teng Pan et al.ICML 2026 · 8 citations
