Testing Fourier Sparsity via Implicit Sensing
Arijit Ghosh, Subhamoy Maitra, Manmatha Roy
Abstract
Boolean functions constitute a fundamental object of study in machine learning and theoretical computer science. Among their various complexity measures, Fourier sparsity, the number of nonzero coefficients in a function’s Fourier expansion, serves as a natural indicator of structural simplicity. For more than three decades, the problem of learning Boolean functions with sparse Fourier representations has occupied a central place in computational learning theory. A major line of progress has produced algorithms whose complexities depend primarily on the sparsity parameter itself. However, these methods typically assume that this parameter is known in advance. In this work, we explore the problem of Fourier sparsity testing, which naturally relates to this question. Given query access to a Boolean function , we seek to determine whether it is -Fourier sparse or far (under Hamming distance) from every such function.
Our contributions are twofold. On the algorithmic side, we design a new tester with query complexity , independent of the ambient dimension. On the lower bound side, we prove that any tester requires at least queries. Both bounds improve upon the best known results of Gopalan et al. (SICOMP 2011), who obtained a tester with query complexity and a lower bound of . For the upper bound, we introduce a refined notion of a sampler inspired by the junta testing framework and combine it with -minimization-based compressed sensing techniques. In doing so, we develop a novel method for sampling leaves of parity decision trees associated with Fourier-sparse Boolean functions. The lower bound is obtained via a reduction from communication complexity, leveraging structural properties of Fourier coefficients of a specific class of cryptographically hard functions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f8234b35-4fd4-48dd-abc5-7457d3c5c94fBuilds on2
Related papers
- Testing Noisy Low-Degree Polynomials for SparsityYiqiao Bao, Anindya De, Shivam Nadimpalli, Rocco A. Servedio et al.STOC 2026 · 1 citation
- An optimal separation of randomized and Quantum query complexityAlexander A. Sherstov, Andrey A. Storozhenko, Pei WuSTOC 2021 · 10 citations
- Halfspaces are hard to test with relative errorXi Chen, Anindya De, Yizhi Huang, Shivam Nadimpalli et al.SODA 2026
- Relative-error monotonicity testingXi Chen, Anindya De, Yizhi Huang, Yuhao Li et al.SODA 2025 · 1 citation
- Restriction Trees for Sparsity and ApplicationsArkadev Chattopadhyay, Yogesh Dahiya, Shachar LovettSTOC 2026 · 3 citations
