Testing Noisy Low-Degree Polynomials for Sparsity
Yiqiao Bao, Anindya De, Shivam Nadimpalli, Rocco A. Servedio, Nathan White
Abstract
We consider the problem of testing whether an unknown low-degree polynomial p over R n is sparse versus far from sparse, given access to noisy evaluations of the polynomial p at randomly chosen points. This is a natural property-testing version of various well-studied problems about learning low-degree sparse polynomials in the presence of noise, and is a generalization of the work of Chen, De, and Servedio [CDS20], on testing noisy linear functions for sparsity, to the more challenging setting of low-degree polynomials.
Our main result gives a precise characterization of when sparsity testing for low-degree polynomials can be carried out with constant sample complexity independent of dimension, along with a constant-sample algorithm for this problem in the parameter regime where this is possible. In more detail, for any mean-zero variance-one finitely supported distribution X over the reals, any degree parameter d, and any sparsity parameters s and T ≥ s, we define a computable function Max-Sparsity-Gap X,d (•), and:
• For T ≥ Max-Sparsity-Gap X,d (s) we give an O s,X,d (1)-sample algorithm for the problem of distinguishing whether a multilinear degree-d polynomial over R n is s-sparse versus ε-far from T -sparse, given independent labeled examples (x, p(x) + noise) x∼X ⊗n . (Crucially, this sample complexity is completely independent of the ambient dimension n.) On the other hand,
• For T ≤ Max-Sparsity-Gap X,d (s) -1, we show that even in the absence of noise, any algorithm for distinguishing whether a multilinear degree-d polynomial is s-sparse versus ε-far from T -sparse, given independent labeled examples (x, p(x)) x∼X ⊗n , must use Ω X,d,s (log n) examples.
Our techniques employ a generalization of the results of Dinur, Friedgut, Kindler, and O'Donnell [DFKO07] on the Fourier tails of bounded functions over ±1 n to a broad range of finitely supported distributions, which may be of independent interest.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext db831472-bc90-4ccc-bc59-c90bd43f6e6fBuilds on2
Related papers
- Low Degree Testing over the RealsVipul Arora, Arnab Bhattacharyya, Noah Fleming, Esty Kelman et al.SODA 2023 · 2 citations
- Testing Fourier Sparsity via Implicit SensingArijit Ghosh, Subhamoy Maitra, Manmatha RoyICLR 2026
- Reconstruction under outliers for Fourier-sparse functionsXue Chen, Anindya DeSODA 2020 · 1 citation
- Detecting Low-Degree TruncationAnindya De, Huan Li, Shivam Nadimpalli, Rocco A. ServedioSTOC 2024 · 2 citations
- Price of Parsimony: Complexity of Fourier Sparsity TestingArijit Ghosh, Manmatha RoyNeurIPS 2025
