Restriction Trees for Sparsity and Applications
Arkadev Chattopadhyay, Yogesh Dahiya, Shachar Lovett
Abstract
Exact and point-wise approximating representations of Boolean functions by real polynomials have been of great interest in the theory of computing. We focus on the study of sparsity of such representations. Our results include the following: First, we show that for every total Boolean function, its exact and approximate sparsity in the De Morgan basis are polynomially related to each other in the log scale, ignoring poly-log(n) factors. This answers an open question posed by Knop, Lovett, McGuire and Yuan (STOC 2021). It builds on and is analogous to the seminal result of Nisan and Szegedy (Computational Complexity 1994) who proved the same for degree and approximate degree. Second, we consider more powerful representations using generalized monomials, where each monomial is an indicator of a sub-cube. There are 3n such monomials, where n is the number of variables. We prove that even for these representations, the sparsity and approximate sparsity of total Boolean functions remain polynomially related to each other in the log scale, ignoring poly-log(n) factors. Third, we show that for every total Boolean function f, the log of its De Morgan sparsity characterizes up to polynomial loss and ignoring poly-log(n) factors, the quantum and classical 2-party bounded-error communication complexity of f ∘ EQ4, where EQ4 is Equality of two 2-bit strings, one held by Alice and the other by Bob. As a consequence, we show that bounded-error quantum protocols cannot exhibit super-polynomial cost advantage over their classical counterparts, for computing such functions. At the core of all our results lies a novel characterization of non-sparse functions. This characterization is in terms of a combinatorial object that we call max-degree restriction trees. These objects locally certify high sparsity, in the same sense that block-sensitivity locally certifies degree.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b364b1f3-0b71-4511-a5b2-987af467d544Builds on5
- The Demand Query Model for Bipartite MatchingNoam NisanSODA 2021 · 13 citations
- Degree vs. approximate degree and Quantum implications of Huang's sensitivity theoremScott Aaronson, Shalev Ben-David, Robin Kothari, Shravas Rao et al.STOC 2021 · 6 citations
- Bipartite perfect matching as a real polynomialGal Beniamini, Noam NisanSTOC 2021 · 4 citations
- Randomized versus Deterministic Decision Tree SizeArkadev Chattopadhyay, Yogesh Dahiya, Nikhil S. Mande, Jaikumar Radhakrishnan et al.STOC 2023 · 2 citations
- Log-rank and lifting for AND-functionsAlexander Knop, Shachar Lovett, Sam McGuire, Weiqiang YuanSTOC 2021 · 1 citation
Related papers
- An optimal separation of randomized and Quantum query complexityAlexander A. Sherstov, Andrey A. Storozhenko, Pei WuSTOC 2021 · 10 citations
- Testing Fourier Sparsity via Implicit SensingArijit Ghosh, Subhamoy Maitra, Manmatha RoyICLR 2026
- Negations Are Powerful Even in Small DepthBruno Cavalar, Théo Borém Fabris, Partha Mukhopadhyay, Srikanth Srinivasan et al.STOC 2026 · 1 citation
- Lower bounds for monotone arithmetic circuits via communication complexityArkadev Chattopadhyay, Rajit Datta, Partha MukhopadhyaySTOC 2021 · 3 citations
- XOR Lemmas for Communication via Marginal InformationSiddharth Iyer, Anup RaoSTOC 2024 · 2 citations
