The Secretary Problem with Independent Sampling
José Correa, Andrés Cristi, Laurent Feuilloley, Tim Oosterwijk, Alexandros Tsigonias-Dimitriadis
Abstract
In the secretary problem we are faced with an online sequence of elements with values. Upon seeing an element we have to make an irrevocable take-it-or-leave-it decision. The goal is to maximize the probability of picking the element of maximum value. The most classic version of the problem is that in which the elements arrive in random order and their values are arbitrary. Here, the optimal algorithm picks the maximum value with probability at least 1/e. However, by varying the available information, new interesting problems arise. For instance, in the full information variant of the secretary problem the values are i.i.d. samples from a known distribution. Naturally, the best possible success probability increases and turns out to be approximately 0.58. Also, the case in which the arrival order is adversarial instead of random leads to interesting variants that have been considered in the literature.
In this paper we study both the random order and adversarial order secretary problems with an additional twist. The values are arbitrary, but before starting the online sequence we independently sample each element with a fixed probability p. The sampled elements become our information or history set and the game is played over the remaining elements. We call these problems the random order secretary problem with p-sampling (ROSp for short) and the adversarial order secretary problem with p-sampling (AOSp for short). Our main result is to obtain best possible algorithms for both problems and all values of p. As p grows to 1 the obtained guarantees converge to the optimal guarantees in the full information case. In the adversarial order setting, the best possible algorithm turns out to be a simple fixed threshold algorithm in which the optimal threshold is a function of p only. Therefore, even knowledge of the total number of elements is unnecessary. Proving that this algorithm is optimal involves a novel technique, which boils down to analyzing a related game in a conflict graph over binary sequences. In the random order setting we prove that the best possible algorithm is characterized by a fixed sequence of time thresholds, dictating at which point in time we should start accepting a value that is both a maximum of the online sequence and has a given ranking within the sampled elements. Surprisingly, this sequence of time thresholds arises from a separable and convex optimization problem whose solution is independent of p.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f4039bbb-c996-4e4b-98c1-41f305a39799Cited by top-tier papers5
- Learning from a Sample in Online AlgorithmsC. J. Argue, Alan M. Frieze, Anupam Gupta, Christopher SeilerNeurIPS 2022 · 16 citations
- Individual Welfare Guarantees in the Autobidding World with Machine-learned AdviceYuan Deng, Negin Golrezaei, Patrick Jaillet, Jason Cheuk Nam Liang et al.WWW 2024 · 11 citations
- The Secretary Problem with Predicted Additive GapAlexander Braun, Sherry SarkarNeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- "Who is Next in Line?" On the Significance of Knowing the Arrival Order in Bayesian Online SettingsTomer Ezra, Michal Feldman, Nick Gravin, Zhihao Gavin TangSODA 2023 · 7 citations
- Secretary Problems: The Power of a Single SamplePranav Nuti, Jan VondrákSODA 2023 · 3 citations
Builds on2
Related papers
- Additively Competitive SecretariesMohammad Mahdian, Jieming Mao, Enze Sun, Kangning Wang et al.WWW 2026
- Ordinal Secretaries with AdviceHasti Nourmohammadi Sigaroudi, Ying Cao, Bo Sun, Xiaoqi TanAAAI 2026
- Prophet Inequalities Require Only a Constant Number of SamplesAndrés Cristi, Bruno ZiliottoSTOC 2024 · 6 citations
- The Secretary Problem with Competing Employers on Random Edge ArrivalsXiaohui Bei, Shengyu ZhangAAAI 2022 · 1 citation
- Online Weighted Matching with a SampleHaim Kaplan, David Naori, Danny RazSODA 2022 · 14 citations
