Secretary Problems: The Power of a Single Sample
Pranav Nuti, Jan Vondrák
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate two variants of the secretary problem. In these variants, we are presented with a sequence of numbers X i that come from distributions D i , and that arrive in either random or adversarial order. We do not know what the distributions are, but we have access to a single sample Y i from each distribution D i . After observing each number, we have to make an irrevocable decision about whether we would like to accept it or not with the goal of maximizing the probability of selecting the largest number.
The random order version of this problem was first studied by Correa et al. [SODA 2020] who managed to construct an algorithm that achieves a probability of 0.4529. In this paper, we improve this probability to 0.5009, almost matching an upper bound of 0.5024 which we show follows from earlier work. We also show that there is an algorithm which achieves the probability of 0.5024 asymptotically if no particular distribution is especially likely to yield the largest number. For the adversarial order version of the problem, we show that we can select the maximum number with a probability of 1/4, and that this is best possible. Our work demonstrates that unlike in the case of the expected value objective studied by Rubinstein et al. [ITCS 2020], knowledge of a single sample is not enough to recover the factor of success guaranteed by full knowledge of the distribution.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 23c1cf66-d709-4cff-af3f-d977931f1645Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- Efficient two-sided markets with limited informationPaul Dütting, Federico Fusco, Philip Lazos, Stefano Leonardi et al.STOC 2021 · 18 citations
- The Secretary Problem with Independent SamplingJosé Correa, Andrés Cristi, Laurent Feuilloley, Tim Oosterwijk et al.SODA 2021 · 18 citations
- The Two-Sided Game of Googol and Sample-Based Prophet InequalitiesJosé R. Correa, Andrés Cristi, Boris Epstein, José A. SotoSODA 2020 · 16 citations
- Single-Sample Prophet Inequalities via Greedy-Ordered SelectionConstantine Caramanis, Paul Dütting, Matthew Faw, Federico Fusco et al.SODA 2022 · 12 citations
Related papers
- Prophet Inequalities Require Only a Constant Number of SamplesAndrés Cristi, Bruno ZiliottoSTOC 2024 · 6 citations
- Competitive Analysis with a Sample and the Secretary ProblemHaim Kaplan, David Naori, Danny RazSODA 2020 · 26 citations
- Prophet Secretary and Matching: the Significance of the Largest ItemZiyun Chen, Zhiyi Huang, Dongchen Li, Zhihao Gavin TangSODA 2025 · 1 citation
- Prophet Inequality from Samples: Is the More the Merrier?Tomer EzraSODA 2026 · 1 citation
- Ordinal Secretaries with AdviceHasti Nourmohammadi Sigaroudi, Ying Cao, Bo Sun, Xiaoqi TanAAAI 2026
