PonderLM: Pretraining Language Models to Ponder in Continuous Space
Boyi Zeng, Shixiang Song, Siyuan Huang, Yixuan Wang, He Li, Ziwei He, Xinbing Wang, Zhiyu Li, Zhouhan Lin
Abstract
Humans ponder before articulating complex sentence elements, enabling deeper cognitive processing through focused effort. In this work, we introduce this pondering process into language models by repeatedly invoking the forward process within a single token generation step. During pondering, instead of generating an actual token sampled from the prediction distribution, the model ponders by yielding a weighted sum of all token embeddings according to the predicted token distribution. The generated embedding is then fed back as input for another forward pass. We show that the model can learn to ponder in this way through self-supervised learning, without any human annotations. Experiments across three widely used open-source architectures—GPT-2, Pythia, and LLaMA—and extensive downstream task evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness and generality of our method. On 9 downstream benchmarks, our pondering-enhanced Pythia models significantly outperform the official Pythia models. Notably, our PonderPythia models demonstrate remarkable effectiveness: PonderPythia-2.8B surpasses Pythia-6.9B and rivals Pythia-12B, while our PonderPythia-1B matches TinyLlama-1.1B, a model trained on 10 times more data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f3bcce7d-3d48-4335-baed-a5237d992720Cited by top-tier papers2
- Equilibrium Reasoners: Learning Attractors Enables Scalable ReasoningBenhao Huang, Zhengyang Geng, Zico KolterICML 2026 · 5 citations
- Revisiting Padded Transformer Expressivity: Which Architectural Choices Matter and Which Don'tAnej Svete, William Merrill, Ryan Cotterell, Ashish SabharwalICML 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on26
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
Related papers
- PonderLM-2: Pretraining LLM with Latent Thoughts in Continuous SpaceBoyi Zeng, He Li, Shixiang Song, Yixuan Wang et al.ICML 2026 · 10 citations
- Context-level Language Modeling by Learning Predictive Context Embeddingsbeiya dai, Yuliang Liu, Yunchong Song, Daozheng Xue et al.ICML 2026 · 5 citations
- Inner Thinking Transformer: Leveraging Dynamic Depth Scaling to Foster Adaptive Internal ThinkingYilong Chen, Junyuan Shang, Zhenyu Zhang, Yanxi Xie et al.ACL 2025
- SparQ Attention: Bandwidth-Efficient LLM InferenceLuka Ribar, Ivan Chelombiev, Luke Hudlass-Galley, Charlie Blake et al.ICML 2024 · 108 citations
- Think Deep, Not Just Long: Measuring LLM Reasoning Effort via Deep-Thinking TokensWei-Lin Chen, Liqian Peng, Tian Tan, Chao Zhao et al.ICML 2026 · 20 citations
