Inner Thinking Transformer: Leveraging Dynamic Depth Scaling to Foster Adaptive Internal Thinking
Yilong Chen, Junyuan Shang, Zhenyu Zhang, Yanxi Xie, Jiawei Sheng, Tingwen Liu, Shuohuan Wang, Yu Sun, Hua Wu, Haifeng Wang
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) face a performance ceiling as scaling parameters becomes impractical. Our observations indicate that while simple tokens are efficiently resolved in early layers with stable gradients, complex tokens trigger abrupt gradient spikes across layers, underscoring architectural limitations. Existing step-by-step reasoning methods, such as Chain-of-Thought, are hindered by their dependence on accurately generating critical tokens. We introduce Inner Thinking Transformer (ITT)-a straightforward approach that enables models to "think" more deeply about important tokens by dynamically assigning extra inference steps through a token-wise dynamic depth architecture with residual iterative reasoning and step encoding. Experiments on LLaMA2-7B models at 355M, 1B, and 3B scales show that ITT consistently outperforms vanilla Transformers, with a 355M ITT model matching the performance of a 1B Transformer, offering a scalable, architecture-aware strategy to enhance LLM reasoning capabilities.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6acae08f-bf2d-45bf-bff7-d22578919605Cited by top-tier papers16
- When More is Less: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Length in LLMsYuyang Wu, Yifei Wang, Ziyu Ye, Tianqi Du et al.ICLR 2026 · 225 citations
- Mixture-of-Recursions: Learning Dynamic Recursive Depths for Adaptive Token-Level ComputationSangmin Bae, Yujin Kim, Reza Bayat, Sungnyun Kim et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 143 citations
- Think Silently, Think Fast: Dynamic Latent Compression of LLM Reasoning ChainsWenhui Tan, Jiaze Li, Jianzhong Ju, Zhenbo Luo et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 103 citations
- SIM-CoT: Supervised Implicit Chain-of-ThoughtXilin Wei, Xiaoran Liu, Yuhang Zang, Xiaoyi Dong et al.ICLR 2026 · 58 citations
- LaDiR: Latent Diffusion Enhances LLMs for Text ReasoningHaoqiang Kang, Yizhe Zhang, Nikki Lijing Kuang, Nicklas Majamaki et al.ICLR 2026 · 25 citations
Builds on19
- ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language RepresentationsZhenzhong Lan, Mingda Chen, Sebastian Goodman, Kevin Gimpel et al.ICLR 2020 · 7,418 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao et al.AAAI 2020 · 2,916 citations
- Scaling Vision with Sparse Mixture of ExpertsCarlos Riquelme, Joan Puigcerver, Basil Mustafa, Maxim Neumann et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,213 citations
- Mixture-of-Experts with Expert Choice RoutingYanqi Zhou, Tao Lei, Hanxiao Liu, Nan Du et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 933 citations
Related papers
- Reasoning with Latent Thoughts: On the Power of Looped TransformersNikunj Saunshi, Nishanth Dikkala, Zhiyuan Li, Sanjiv Kumar et al.ICLR 2025
- Think Deep, Not Just Long: Measuring LLM Reasoning Effort via Deep-Thinking TokensWei-Lin Chen, Liqian Peng, Tian Tan, Chao Zhao et al.ICML 2026 · 20 citations
- Demystifying Reasoning Dynamics with Mutual Information: Thinking Tokens are Information Peaks in LLM ReasoningChen Qian, Dongrui Liu, Haochen Wen, Zhen Bai et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 63 citations
- ReEfBench: Quantifying the Reasoning Efficiency of LLMsZhizhang Fu, Yuancheng Gu, Chenkai Hu, Hanmeng Liu et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Thought calibration: Efficient and confident test-time scalingMenghua Wu, Cai Zhou, Stephen Bates, Tommi S. JaakkolaEMNLP 2025 · 12 citations
