Equilibrium Reasoners: Learning Attractors Enables Scalable Reasoning
Benhao Huang, Zhengyang Geng, Zico Kolter
Abstract
Scaling test-time compute by iteratively updating a latent state has emerged as a powerful paradigm for reasoning. Yet, the internal mechanisms that enable these iterative models to generalize beyond memorized patterns remain fundamentally unclear. We hypothesize that such generalizable reasoning arises from learning task-conditioned attractors: a latent dynamical system where stable fixed points correspond to valid solutions. We formalize this process by introducing Equilibrium Reasoners (EqR). EqR enables test-time scaling without relying on external verifiers or task-specific priors. Instead, our models scale internal dynamics along two axes: depth by running more iterations and breadth by aggregating stochastic trajectories from multiple initializations. Empirically, performance gains from scaling test-time compute are tightly coupled with better convergence to attractors. This attractor perspective allows neural networks to adaptively allocate test-time compute based on task difficulty. While simple cases converge within 1 to 5 iteration steps, the hardest cases benefit from massive test-time scaling. By unrolling up to an equivalent of 40,000 layers, this scalable latent reasoning boosts accuracy from 2.6% for feedforward models to over 99% on Sudoku-Extreme. We hope our attractor perspective sheds light on scalable reasoning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on31
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Sharpness-aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving GeneralizationPierre Foret, Ariel Kleiner, Hossein Mobahi, Behnam NeyshaburICLR 2021 · 1,861 citations
- Scaling up Test-Time Compute with Latent Reasoning: A Recurrent Depth ApproachJonas Geiping, Sean McLeish, Neel Jain, John Kirchenbauer et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 431 citations
- The Expressive Power of Transformers with Chain of ThoughtWilliam Merrill, Ashish SabharwalICLR 2024 · 243 citations
- Think before you speak: Training Language Models With Pause TokensSachin Goyal, Ziwei Ji, Ankit Singh Rawat, Aditya Krishna Menon et al.ICLR 2024 · 240 citations
Related papers
- C-Voting: Confidence-Based Test-Time Voting without Explicit Energy FunctionsKenji Kubo, Shunsuke Kamiya, Masanori Koyama, Kohei Hayashi et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Stabilizing Recurrent Dynamics for Test-Time Scalable Latent Reasoning in Looped Language ModelsXiao-Wen Yang, Zi-Yu Han, Xi-Hua Zhang, Wen-Da Wei et al.ICML 2026 · 6 citations
- Deep Equilibrium Algorithmic ReasoningDobrik Georgiev, Joseph Wilson, Davide Buffelli, Pietro LióNeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- What If We Allocate Test-Time Compute Adaptively?Ahsan Bilal, Muhammad Ahmed Mohsin, Muhammad Umer, Ali Subhan et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- End-to-end Algorithm Synthesis with Recurrent Networks: Extrapolation without OverthinkingArpit Bansal, Avi Schwarzschild, Eitan Borgnia, Zeyad Emam et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 54 citations
