Designing Resource Allocation Tools to Promote Fair Allocation: Do Visualization and Information Framing Matter?
Arnav Verma, Luiz Augusto de Macêdo Morais, Pierre Dragicevic, Fanny Chevalier
Abstract
Studies on human decision-making focused on humanitarian aid have found that cognitive biases can hinder the fair allocation of resources. However, few HCI and Information Visualization studies have explored ways to overcome those cognitive biases. This work investigates whether the design of interactive resource allocation tools can help to promote allocation fairness. We specifically study the effect of presentation format (using text or visualization) and a specific framing strategy (showing resources allocated to groups or individuals). In our three crowdsourced experiments, we provided different tool designs to split money between two fictional programs that benefit two distinct communities. Our main finding indicates that individual-framed visualizations and text may be able to curb unfair allocations caused by group-framed designs. This work opens new perspectives that can motivate research on how interactive tools and visualizations can be engineered to combat cognitive biases that lead to inequitable decisions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f3ab33da-89e1-4ad7-ad7a-b79ac8b376c7Cited by top-tier papers3
- Data Probes as Boundary Objects for Technology Policy Design: Demystifying Technology for Policymakers and Aligning Stakeholder Objectives in Rideshare Gig WorkAngie Zhang, Rocita Rana, Alexander Boltz, Veena Dubal et al.CHI 2024 · 20 citations
- How Do HCI Researchers Study Cognitive Biases? A Scoping ReviewNattapat Boonprakong, Benjamin Tag, Jorge Gonçalves, Tilman DinglerCHI 2025 · 19 citations
- What Can Interactive Visualization Do for Participatory Budgeting in Chicago?Alex Kale, Danni Liu, Maria Gabriela Ayala, Harper Schwab et al.IEEE VIS 2024 · 5 citations
Builds on5
- Surfacing Visualization MiragesAndrew M. McNutt, Gordon Kindlmann, Michael CorrellCHI 2020 · 103 citations
- Can Anthropographics Promote Prosociality?A Review and Large-Sample StudyLuiz Augusto de Macêdo Morais, Yvonne Jansen, Nazareno Andrade, Pierre DragicevicCHI 2021 · 25 citations
- Do You See What You Mean? Using Predictive Visualizations to Reduce Optimism in Duration EstimatesMorgane Koval, Yvonne JansenCHI 2022 · 10 citations
- On the Desiderata for Online Altruism: Nudging for Equitable DonationsNuno Mota, Abhijnan Chakraborty, Asia J. Biega, Krishna P. Gummadi et al.CSCW 2020 · 9 citations
- Framing Effects Influence Interface Feature DecisionsAndy Cockburn, Blaine Lewis, Philip Quinn, Carl GutwinCHI 2020 · 5 citations
Related papers
- My Model is Unfair, Do People Even Care? Visual Design Affects Trust and Perceived Bias in Machine LearningAimen Gaba, Zhanna Kaufman, Jason Cheung, Marie Shvakel et al.IEEE VIS 2023 · 20 citations
- Effect of Information Presentation on Fairness Perceptions of Machine Learning PredictorsNiels van Berkel, Jorge Gonçalves, Daniel Russo, Simo Hosio et al.CHI 2021 · 84 citations
- Dispersion vs Disparity: Hiding Variability Can Encourage Stereotyping When Visualizing Social OutcomesEli Holder, Cindy XiongIEEE VIS 2022 · 22 citations
- Deciding Fast and Slow: The Role of Cognitive Biases in AI-assisted Decision-makingCharvi Rastogi, Yunfeng Zhang, Dennis Wei, Kush R. Varshney et al.CSCW 2022 · 184 citations
- The Rational Agent Benchmark for Data VisualizationYifan Wu, Ziyang Guo, Michalis Mamakos, Jason D. Hartline et al.IEEE VIS 2023 · 8 citations
