Framing Effects Influence Interface Feature Decisions
Andy Cockburn, Blaine Lewis, Philip Quinn, Carl Gutwin
Abstract
Studies in psychology have shown that framing effects, where the positive or negative attributes of logically equivalent choices are emphasised, influence people's decisions. When outcomes are uncertain, framing effects also induce patterns of choice reversal, where decisions tend to be risk averse when gains are emphasised and risk seeking when losses are emphasised. Studies of these effects typically use potent framing stimuli, such as the mortality of people suffering from diseases or personal financial standing. We examine whether these effects arise in users' decisions about interface features, which typically have less visceral consequences, using a crowd-sourced study based on snap-to-grid drag-and-drop tasks (n = 842). The study examined several framing conditions: those similar to prior psychological research, and those similar to typical interaction choices (enabling/disabling features). Results indicate that attribute framing strongly influences users' decisions, that these decisions conform to patterns of risk seeking for losses, and that patterns of choice reversal occur.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get b6ac8bb4-2244-4eb2-9f6c-ead0cfe67f12Cited by top-tier papers3
- Designing Resource Allocation Tools to Promote Fair Allocation: Do Visualization and Information Framing Matter?Arnav Verma, Luiz Augusto de Macêdo Morais, Pierre Dragicevic, Fanny ChevalierCHI 2023 · 7 citations
- "I followed what felt right, not what I was told": Autonomy, Coaching, and Recognizing Bias Through AI-Mediated DialogueAtieh Taheri, Hamza El Alaoui, Patrick Carrington, Jeffrey P. BighamCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- When Should Users Check? Modeling Confirmation Frequency in Multi-Step Agentic AI TasksJieyu Zhou, Aryan Roy, Sneh Gupta, Daniel Weitekamp III et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
Related papers
- The Role of Heuristics and Biases during Complex Choices with an AI TeammateNikolos Gurney, John H. Miller, David V. PynadathAAAI 2023 · 5 citations
- Who is the Expert? Reconciling Algorithm Aversion and Algorithm Appreciation in AI-Supported Decision MakingYoyo Tsung-Yu Hou, Malte F. JungCSCW 2021 · 111 citations
- Overlooking Context: How do Defaults and Framing Reduce Deliberation in Smart Home Privacy Decision-Making?Paritosh Bahirat, Martijn C. Willemsen, Yangyang He, Qizhang Sun et al.CHI 2021 · 18 citations
- Probability Weighting in Interactive Decisions: Evidence for Overuse of Bad Assistance, Underuse of Good AssistanceAndy Cockburn, Philip Quinn, Carl Gutwin, Zhe Chen et al.CHI 2022 · 49 citations
- Exploring Nudge Designs to Help Adolescent SNS Users Avoid Privacy and Safety ThreatsHiroaki Masaki, Kengo Shibata, Shui Hoshino, Takahiro Ishihama et al.CHI 2020 · 62 citations
