Overlooking Context: How do Defaults and Framing Reduce Deliberation in Smart Home Privacy Decision-Making?
Paritosh Bahirat, Martijn C. Willemsen, Yangyang He, Qizhang Sun, Bart P. Knijnenburg
Abstract
Research has demonstrated that users’ heuristic decision-making processes cause external factors like defaults and framing to influence the outcome of privacy decisions. Proponents of “privacy nudging” have proposed leveraging these effects to guide users’ decisions. Our research shows that defaults and framing not only influence the outcome of privacy decisions, but also the process of evaluating the contextual factors associated with the decision, effectively making the decision-making process more heuristic. In our analysis of an existing dataset of scenario-based smart home privacy decisions, we demonstrate that defaults and framing not only have a direct effect on participants’ decisions; they also moderate the effect of their cognitive appraisals of the presented scenarios on the decision. These results suggest that nudges like defaults and framing exacerbate the well-researched problem that people often employ heuristics rather than making deliberate privacy decisions, and that privacy-setting interfaces should avoid the effects of heuristic decision-making.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 9f79255c-8b36-4a58-b412-11733f7f70f6Cited by top-tier papers7
- A Longitudinal In-the-Wild Investigation of Design Frictions to Prevent Smartphone OveruseLuke Haliburton, David Joachim Grüning, Frederik Riedel, Albrecht Schmidt et al.CHI 2024 · 23 citations
- SoK: Technical Implementation and Human Impact of Internet Privacy RegulationsEleanor Birrell, Jay Rodolitz, Angel Ding, Jenna Lee et al.S&P 2024 · 11 citations
- Personalizing Privacy Protection With Individuals' Regulatory Focus: Would You Preserve or Enhance Your Information Privacy?Reza Ghaiumy Anaraky, Yao Li, Hichang Cho, Danny Yuxing Huang et al.CHI 2024 · 5 citations
- Real-World Winds: Micro Challenges to Promote Balance Post Smartphone OverloadNada Terzimehic, Julia Huber, Sarah Aragon-Hahner, Sven MayerCHI 2024 · 5 citations
- "I followed what felt right, not what I was told": Autonomy, Coaching, and Recognizing Bias Through AI-Mediated DialogueAtieh Taheri, Hamza El Alaoui, Patrick Carrington, Jeffrey P. BighamCHI 2026 · 1 citation
Related papers
- Influence or Deception? Evaluating Social Suggestions with Persuasive Statements for Security and Privacy SettingsAyako Akiyama Hasegawa, Takahiro Kasama, Mitsuaki AkiyamaCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Online Privacy Heuristics that Predict Information DisclosureS. Shyam Sundar, Jinyoung Kim, Mary Beth Rosson, Maria D. MolinaCHI 2020 · 62 citations
- Exploring Nudge Designs to Help Adolescent SNS Users Avoid Privacy and Safety ThreatsHiroaki Masaki, Kengo Shibata, Shui Hoshino, Takahiro Ishihama et al.CHI 2020 · 62 citations
- The Role of Heuristics and Biases during Complex Choices with an AI TeammateNikolos Gurney, John H. Miller, David V. PynadathAAAI 2023 · 5 citations
- Exploring Tenants' Preferences of Privacy Negotiation in AirbnbZixin Wang, Danny Yuxing Huang, Yaxing YaoUSENIX Security 2023
