Personalizing Privacy Protection With Individuals' Regulatory Focus: Would You Preserve or Enhance Your Information Privacy?
Reza Ghaiumy Anaraky, Yao Li, Hichang Cho, Danny Yuxing Huang, Kaileigh Angela Byrne, Bart P. Knijnenburg, Oded Nov
Abstract
In this study, we explore the effectiveness of persuasive messages endorsing the adoption of a privacy protection technology (IoT Inspector) tailored to individuals’ regulatory focus (promotion or prevention). We explore if and how regulatory fit (i.e., tuning the goal-pursuit mechanism to individuals’ internal regulatory focus) can increase persuasion and adoption. We conducted a between-subject experiment (N = 236) presenting participants with the IoT Inspector in gain ("Privacy Enhancing Technology"—PET) or loss ("Privacy Preserving Technology"—PPT) framing. Results show that the effect of regulatory fit on adoption is mediated by trust and privacy calculus processes: prevention-focused users who read the PPT message trust the tool more. Furthermore, privacy calculus favors using the tool when promotion-focused individuals read the PET message. We discuss the contribution of understanding the cognitive mechanisms behind regulatory fit in privacy decision-making to support privacy protection.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5fede4fe-3377-49e3-86e2-9bbb262c6e8fCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on10
- IoT Inspector: Crowdsourcing Labeled Network Traffic from Smart Home Devices at ScaleDanny Yuxing Huang, Noah J. Apthorpe, Frank Li, Gunes Acar et al.UbiComp 2020 · 171 citations
- Online Privacy Heuristics that Predict Information DisclosureS. Shyam Sundar, Jinyoung Kim, Mary Beth Rosson, Maria D. MolinaCHI 2020 · 62 citations
- To Disclose or Not to Disclose: Examining the Privacy Decision-Making Processes of Older vs. Younger AdultsReza Ghaiumy Anaraky, Kaileigh Angela Byrne, Pamela J. Wisniewski, Xinru Page et al.CHI 2021 · 56 citations
- Taking Data Out of Context to Hyper-Personalize Ads: Crowdworkers' Privacy Perceptions and Decisions to Disclose Private InformationJulia Hanson, Miranda Wei, Sophie Veys, Matthew Kugler et al.CHI 2020 · 25 citations
- Difficulties of Measuring Culture in Privacy StudiesReza Ghaiumy Anaraky, Yao Li, Bart P. KnijnenburgCSCW 2021 · 24 citations
Related papers
- Tailoring a Persuasive Game to Promote Secure Smartphone BehaviourAnirudh Ganesh, Chinenye Ndulue, Rita OrjiCHI 2023 · 23 citations
- Overlooking Context: How do Defaults and Framing Reduce Deliberation in Smart Home Privacy Decision-Making?Paritosh Bahirat, Martijn C. Willemsen, Yangyang He, Qizhang Sun et al.CHI 2021 · 18 citations
- Motivation and Personality Theories in a Gamified Mobile Application for WalkingBrian Ravenet, David Rei, Céline Clavel, Jean-Claude MartinCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Reward Seeking or Loss Aversion?: Impact of Regulatory Focus Theory on Emotional Induction in Children and Their Behavior Towards a Social RobotMaha Elgarf, Natalia Calvo-Barajas, Ana Paiva, Ginevra Castellano et al.CHI 2021 · 16 citations
- Is a Trustmark and QR Code Enough? The Effect of IoT Security and Privacy Label Information Complexity on Consumer Comprehension and BehaviorClaire C. Chen, Dillon Shu, Hamsini Ravishankar, Xinran Li et al.CHI 2024 · 27 citations
