Difficulties of Measuring Culture in Privacy Studies
Reza Ghaiumy Anaraky, Yao Li, Bart P. Knijnenburg
Abstract
This paper addresses inconsistencies that exist in the measurement instruments HCI researchers use in cross-cultural studies. We study some commonly used measurement instruments that capture cultural dimensions at an individual level and conduct "measurement invariance tests," which test whether the questions comprising a construct have similar characteristics across different groups (e.g., countries). We find that these cultural dimensions are, to some extent, non-invariant, making statistical comparisons between countries problematic. Furthermore, we study the (non)invariance of the causal relationship between these cultural dimensions and privacy-related constructs, e.g., privacy concern and the amount of information users share on social media. Our results suggest that in several instances, these cultural dimensions have a different effect on privacy-related constructs per country. This severely reduces their usefulness for developing cross-cultural arguments in cross-country studies. We discuss the value of conducting measurement and causal non-invariance tests and urge scholars to develop more robust means of measuring culture.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 2b359fb8-3305-4fb3-be0d-4958aa26db51Cited by top-tier papers5
- A Decade of Privacy-Relevant Android App Reviews: Large Scale TrendsOmer Akgul, Sai Teja Peddinti, Nina Taft, Michelle L. Mazurek et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 14 citations
- Personalizing Privacy Protection With Individuals' Regulatory Focus: Would You Preserve or Enhance Your Information Privacy?Reza Ghaiumy Anaraky, Yao Li, Hichang Cho, Danny Yuxing Huang et al.CHI 2024 · 5 citations
- Mind the Gap: Mapping Wearer-Bystander Privacy Tensions and Context-Adaptive Pathways for Camera GlassesXueyang Wang, Kewen Peng, Xin Yi, Hewu LiCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Privacy Control in Conversational LLM Platforms: A Walkthrough StudyZhuoyang Li, Yanlai Wu, Yao Li, Xinning Gui et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Digital Security Perceptions and Practices Around the World: A WEIRD versus Non-WEIRD ComparisonFranziska Herbert, Collins W. Munyendo, Jonas Hielscher, Steffen Becker et al.USENIX Security 2025
Related papers
- How Not to Measure Social Network Privacy: A Cross-Country InvestigationYao Li, Reza Ghaiumy Anaraky, Bart P. KnijnenburgCSCW 2021 · 9 citations
- A Tale of Two Cultures: Comparing Interpersonal Information Disclosure Norms on TwitterMainack Mondal, Anju Punuru, Tyng-Wen Scott Cheng, Kenneth Vargas et al.CSCW 2023 · 6 citations
- How WEIRD is Usable Privacy and Security Research?Ayako Akiyama Hasegawa, Daisuke Inoue, Mitsuaki AkiyamaUSENIX Security 2024 · 26 citations
- Country Differences in Social Comparison on Social MediaJustin Cheng, Moira Burke, Bethany de GantCSCW 2020 · 35 citations
- Many Islands, Many Problems: An Empirical Examination of Online Safety Behaviors in the CaribbeanDaricia Wilkinson, Bart P. KnijnenburgCHI 2022 · 19 citations
