Do You See What You Mean? Using Predictive Visualizations to Reduce Optimism in Duration Estimates
Morgane Koval, Yvonne Jansen
Abstract
Making time estimates, such as how long a given task might take, frequently leads to inaccurate predictions because of an optimistic bias. Previous attempts to alleviate this bias, including decomposing the task into smaller components and listing potential surprises, have not shown any major improvement. This article builds on the premise that these procedures may have failed because they involve compound probabilities and mixture distributions which are difficult to compute in one’s head. We hypothesize that predictive visualizations of such distributions would facilitate the estimation of task durations. We conducted a crowdsourced study in which 145 participants provided different estimates of overall and sub-task durations and we used these to generate predictive visualizations of the resulting mixture distributions. We compared participants’ initial estimates with their updated ones and found compelling evidence that predictive visualizations encourage less optimistic estimates.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b68294d6-4e1c-42fa-8da4-94cecf54fcd0Cited by top-tier papers3
- Swaying the Public? Impacts of Election Forecast Visualizations on Emotion, Trust, and Intention in the 2022 U.S. MidtermsFumeng Yang, Mandi Cai, Chloe Mortenson, Hoda Fakhari et al.IEEE VIS 2023 · 30 citations
- How Do HCI Researchers Study Cognitive Biases? A Scoping ReviewNattapat Boonprakong, Benjamin Tag, Jorge Gonçalves, Tilman DinglerCHI 2025 · 19 citations
- Designing Resource Allocation Tools to Promote Fair Allocation: Do Visualization and Information Framing Matter?Arnav Verma, Luiz Augusto de Macêdo Morais, Pierre Dragicevic, Fanny ChevalierCHI 2023 · 7 citations
Builds on2
Related papers
- Playing Planning Poker in Crowds: Human Computation of Software Effort EstimatesMohammed Alhamed, Tim StorerICSE 2021 · 18 citations
- To Plan or Not to Plan? A Mixed-Methods Diary Study Examining When, How and Why Knowledge Work Planning is InaccurateYoana Ahmetoglu, Duncan P. Brumby, Anna L. CoxCSCW 2020 · 21 citations
- Evaluating the Use of Uncertainty Visualisations for Imputations of Data Missing At Random in ScatterplotsAbhraneel Sarma, Shunan Guo, Jane Hoffswell, Ryan A. Rossi et al.IEEE VIS 2022 · 19 citations
- My Model is Unfair, Do People Even Care? Visual Design Affects Trust and Perceived Bias in Machine LearningAimen Gaba, Zhanna Kaufman, Jason Cheung, Marie Shvakel et al.IEEE VIS 2023 · 20 citations
- Revealing Perceptual Proxies with Adversarial ExamplesBrian D. Ondov, Fumeng Yang, Matthew Kay, Niklas Elmqvist et al.IEEE VIS 2020 · 22 citations
