Active Fourier Auditor for Estimating Distributional Properties of ML Models
Ayoub Ajarra, Bishwamittra Ghosh, Debabrota Basu
Abstract
With the pervasive deployment of Machine Learning (ML) models in real-world applications, verifying and auditing properties of ML models have become a central concern. In this work, we focus on three properties: robustness, individual fairness, and group fairness. We discuss two approaches for auditing ML model properties: estimation with and without reconstruction of the target model under audit. Though the first approach is studied in the literature, the second approach remains unexplored. For this purpose, we develop a new framework that quantifies different properties in terms of the Fourier coefficients of the ML model under audit but does not parametrically reconstruct it. We propose the Active Fourier Auditor (AFA), which queries sample points according to the Fourier coefficients of the ML model, and further estimates the properties. We derive high probability error bounds on AFA's estimates, along with the worst-case lower bounds on the sample complexity to audit them. Numerically we demonstrate on multiple datasets and models that AFA is more accurate and sample-efficient to estimate the properties of interest than the baselines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on6
- Justicia: A Stochastic SAT Approach to Formally Verify FairnessBishwamittra Ghosh, Debabrota Basu, Kuldeep S. MeelAAAI 2021 · 46 citations
- Bayesian Algorithm Execution: Estimating Computable Properties of Black-box Functions Using Mutual InformationWillie Neiswanger, Ke Alexander Wang, Stefano ErmonICML 2021 · 40 citations
- Algorithmic Fairness Verification with Graphical ModelsBishwamittra Ghosh, Debabrota Basu, Kuldeep S. MeelAAAI 2022 · 26 citations
- Finding Relevant Information via a Discrete Fourier ExpansionMohsen Heidari, Jithin K. Sreedharan, Gil I. Shamir, Wojciech SzpankowskiICML 2021 · 8 citations
- Verifying the unseen: interactive proofs for label-invariant distribution propertiesTal Herman, Guy N. RothblumSTOC 2022 · 4 citations
Related papers
- Active fairness auditingTom Yan, Chicheng ZhangICML 2022 · 34 citations
- Statistical inference for individual fairnessSubha Maity, Songkai Xue, Mikhail Yurochkin, Yuekai SunICLR 2021 · 21 citations
- Certified in Theory, Broken in Practice: Assumption Gaps in Cryptographic Model CertificationCarter Luck, Olive Franzese-McLaughlin, Elisaweta Masserova, Akira Takahashi et al.USENIX Security 2026
- Robust Optimization for Fairness with Noisy Protected GroupsSerena Lutong Wang, Wenshuo Guo, Harikrishna Narasimhan, Andrew Cotter et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 134 citations
- Testing Group Fairness via Optimal Transport ProjectionsNian Si, Karthyek Murthy, Jose H. Blanchet, Viet Anh NguyenICML 2021 · 37 citations
