Algorithmic Fairness Verification with Graphical Models
Bishwamittra Ghosh, Debabrota Basu, Kuldeep S. Meel
Abstract
In recent years, machine learning (ML) algorithms have been deployed in safety-critical and high-stake decision-making, where the fairness of algorithms is of paramount importance. Fairness in ML centers on detecting bias towards certain demographic populations induced by an ML classifier and proposes algorithmic solutions to mitigate the bias with respect to different fairness definitions. To this end, several fairness verifiers have been proposed that compute the bias in the prediction of an ML classifier—essentially beyond a finite dataset—given the probability distribution of input features. In the context of verifying linear classifiers, existing fairness verifiers are limited by accuracy due to imprecise modeling of correlations among features and scalability due to restrictive formulations of the classifiers as SSAT/SMT formulas or by sampling.
In this paper, we propose an efficient fairness verifier, called FVGM, that encodes the correlations among features as a Bayesian network. In contrast to existing verifiers, FVGM proposes a stochastic subset-sum based approach for verifying linear classifiers. Experimentally, we show that FVGM leads to an accurate and scalable assessment for more diverse families of fairness-enhancing algorithms, fairness attacks, and group/causal fairness metrics than the state-of-the-art fairness verifiers. We also demonstrate that FVGM facilitates the computation of fairness influence functions as a stepping stone to detect the source of bias induced by subsets of features.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 990e2f26-da79-4f41-bc30-b3553f58ab33Cited by top-tier papers7
- Monitoring Algorithmic FairnessThomas A. Henzinger, Mahyar Karimi, Konstantin Kueffner, Kaushik MallikCAV 2023 · 13 citations
- Certifying Fairness of Probabilistic CircuitsNikil Roashan Selvam, Guy Van den Broeck, YooJung ChoiAAAI 2023 · 8 citations
- Active Fourier Auditor for Estimating Distributional Properties of ML ModelsAyoub Ajarra, Bishwamittra Ghosh, Debabrota BasuAAAI 2025 · 5 citations
- Robust ML Auditing using Prior KnowledgeJade Garcia Bourrée, Augustin Godinot, Sayan Biswas, Anne-Marie Kermarrec et al.ICML 2025
- Quantifying Sensitivity for Tree Ensembles: A Symbolic and Compositional ApproachAjinkya Naik, Chaitanya Garg, S. Akshay, Ashutosh Gupta et al.CAV 2026
Builds on2
- Algorithmic Transparency via Quantitative Input Influence: Theory and Experiments with Learning SystemsAnupam Datta, Shayak Sen, Yair ZickS&P 2016 · 774 citations
- Justicia: A Stochastic SAT Approach to Formally Verify FairnessBishwamittra Ghosh, Debabrota Basu, Kuldeep S. MeelAAAI 2021 · 46 citations
Related papers
- Fairify: Fairness Verification of Neural NetworksSumon Biswas, Hridesh RajanICSE 2023 · 27 citations
- Incremental Verification of Neural NetworksShubham Ugare, Debangshu Banerjee, Sasa Misailovic, Gagandeep SinghPLDI 2023 · 19 citations
- Fair Conformal Classification via Learning Representation-Based GroupsSenrong Xu, Yanke Zhou, Yuhao Tan, Zenan Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Are Your Fairness Metrics Accurate? A Semi-Supervised Approach to Improving Fairness Estimates Under Sample Selection BiasM. Clara De Paolis Kaluza, Thulasi Tholeti, Yile Chen, Ricardo Baeza-Yates et al.KDD 2025 · 1 citation
- Fix Fairness, Don't Ruin Accuracy: Performance Aware Fairness Repair using AutoMLGiang Nguyen, Sumon Biswas, Hridesh RajanFSE 2023 · 15 citations
