Verifying the unseen: interactive proofs for label-invariant distribution properties
Tal Herman, Guy N. Rothblum
Abstract
Given i.i.d. samples from an unknown distribution over a large domain [N ], approximating several basic quantities, including the distribution's support size, its entropy, and its distance from the uniform distribution, requires Θ(N/ log N ) samples [Valiant and Valiant, STOC 2011].
Suppose, however, that we can interact with a powerful but untrusted prover, who knows the entire distribution (or a good approximation of it). Can we use such a prover to approximate (or rather, to approximately verify) such statistical quantities more efficiently? We show that this is indeed the case: the support size, the entropy, and the distance from the uniform distribution, can all be approximately verified via a 2-message interactive proof, where the communication complexity, the verifier's running time, and the sample complexity are O( √ N ). For all these quantities, the sample complexity is tight up to polylogN factors (for any interactive proof, regardless of its communication complexity or verification time).
More generally, we give a tolerant interactive proof system with the above sample and communication complexities for verifying a distribution's proximity to any label-invariant property (any property that is invariant to re-labeling of the elements in the distribution's support). The verifier's running time in this more general protocol is also O( √ N ), under a mild assumption about the complexity of deciding, given a compact representation of a distribution, whether it is in the property or far from it.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c9628de8-bf4c-4bc1-8c86-d1badf0a92adCited by top-tier papers7
- Proving Natural Distribution Properties is Harder than Testing ThemTal Herman, Guy N. RothblumFOCS 2025 · 5 citations
- Active Fourier Auditor for Estimating Distributional Properties of ML ModelsAyoub Ajarra, Bishwamittra Ghosh, Debabrota BasuAAAI 2025 · 5 citations
- Certifying Private Probabilistic MechanismsZoë Ruha Bell, Shafi Goldwasser, Michael P. Kim, Jean-Luc WatsonCRYPTO 2024 · 4 citations
- On the Power of Interactive Proofs for LearningTom Gur, Mohammad Mahdi Jahanara, Mohammad Mahdi Khodabandeh, Ninad Rajgopal et al.STOC 2024 · 3 citations
- Doubley-Efficient Interactive Proofs for Distribution PropertiesTal Herman, Guy N. RothblumFOCS 2023 · 3 citations
Related papers
- Interactive Proofs for General Distribution PropertiesTal Herman, Guy N. RothblumFOCS 2024 · 1 citation
- How to Verify Any (Reasonable) Distribution Property: Computationally Sound Argument Systems for DistributionsTal Herman, Guy N. RothblumICLR 2025
- Testing Support Size More Efficiently Than Learning HistogramsRenato Ferreira Pinto Jr., Nathaniel HarmsSTOC 2025
- Data Amplification: Instance-Optimal Property EstimationYi Hao, Alon OrlitskyICML 2020 · 23 citations
- Distribution Testing in the Presence of Arbitrarily Dominant Noise with Verification QueriesHadley Black, Christopher YeSODA 2026
