Interactive Proofs for General Distribution Properties
Tal Herman, Guy N. Rothblum
Abstract
Suppose Alice has collected a small number of samples from an unknown distribution, and would like to learn about the distribution. Bob, an untrusted data analyst, claims that he ran a sophisticated data analysis on the distribution, and makes assertions about its properties. Can Alice efficiently verify Bob's claims using fewer resources (say in terms of samples and computation) than would be needed to run the analysis herself?
We construct an interactive proof system for any distribution property that can be decided by uniform polynomial-size circuits of bounded depth: the circuit gets a complete description of the distribution and decides whether it has the property. Taking N to be an upper bound on the size of the distribution's support, the verifier's sample complexity, running time, and the communication complexity are all sublinear in N : they are bounded by O(N 1-α + D) for a constant α > 0, where D is a bound on the depth of the circuits that decide the property. The honest prover runs in poly(N ) time and has quasi-linear sample complexity. Moreover, the proof system is tolerant: it can be used to approximate the distribution's distance from the property. We show similar results for any distribution property that can be decided by a bounded-space Turing machine (that gets as input a complete description of the distribution). We remark that even for simple properties, deciding the property without a prover requires quasi-linear sample complexity and running time. Prior work [Herman and Rothblum, FOCS 2023] demonstrated sublinear interactive proof systems, but only for the much more restricted class of label-invariant distribution properties.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 38520651-bf79-4b9f-8ab8-576b3fa37cadCited by top-tier papers2
- Proving Natural Distribution Properties is Harder than Testing ThemTal Herman, Guy N. RothblumFOCS 2025 · 5 citations
- How to Verify Any (Reasonable) Distribution Property: Computationally Sound Argument Systems for DistributionsTal Herman, Guy N. RothblumICLR 2025
Builds on4
- Proving as fast as computing: succinct arguments with constant prover overheadNoga Ron-Zewi, Ron D. RothblumSTOC 2022 · 23 citations
- Verifying the unseen: interactive proofs for label-invariant distribution propertiesTal Herman, Guy N. RothblumSTOC 2022 · 4 citations
- On the Power of Interactive Proofs for LearningTom Gur, Mohammad Mahdi Jahanara, Mohammad Mahdi Khodabandeh, Ninad Rajgopal et al.STOC 2024 · 3 citations
- Doubley-Efficient Interactive Proofs for Distribution PropertiesTal Herman, Guy N. RothblumFOCS 2023 · 3 citations
Related papers
- The Power of Distributed Verifiers in Interactive ProofsMoni Naor, Merav Parter, Eylon YogevSODA 2020 · 38 citations
- SNARGs for bounded depth computations and PPAD hardness from sub-exponential LWERuta Jawale, Yael Tauman Kalai, Dakshita Khurana, Rachel Yun ZhangSTOC 2021 · 61 citations
- Doubly Efficient Interactive Proofs for General Arithmetic Circuits with Linear Prover TimeJiaheng Zhang, Tianyi Liu, Weijie Wang, Yinuo Zhang et al.CCS 2021 · 4 citations
- Approximate Lower Bound ArgumentsPyrros Chaidos, Aggelos Kiayias, Leonid Reyzin, Anatoliy ZinovyevEUROCRYPT 2024 · 2 citations
- Efficiently Batching Unambiguous Interactive ProofsBonnie Berger, Rohan Goyal, Matthew M. Hong, Yael Tauman KalaiFOCS 2025
