Automated Detection of Visual Attribute Reliance with a Self-Reflective Agent
Christy Li, Josep López Camuñas, Jake Thomas Touchet, Jacob Andreas, Àgata Lapedriza, Antonio Torralba, Tamar Rott Shaham
Abstract
When a vision model performs image recognition, which visual attributes drive its predictions? Detecting unintended reliance on specific visual features is critical for ensuring model robustness, preventing overfitting, and avoiding spurious correlations. We introduce an automated framework for detecting such dependencies in trained vision models. At the core of our method is a self-reflective agent that systematically generates and tests hypotheses about visual attributes that a model may rely on. This process is iterative: the agent refines its hypotheses based on experimental outcomes and uses a self-evaluation protocol to assess whether its findings accurately explain model behavior. When inconsistencies arise, the agent self-reflects over its findings and triggers a new cycle of experimentation. We evaluate our approach on a novel benchmark of 130 models designed to exhibit diverse visual attribute dependencies across 18 categories. Our results show that the agent's performance consistently improves with self-reflection, with a significant performance increase over non-reflective baselines. We further demonstrate that the agent identifies real-world visual attribute dependencies in state-of-the-art models, including CLIP's vision encoder and the YOLOv8 object detector.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ef789afb-a3ac-41b8-a1d1-9d6d5d9bb309Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on22
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-TrainingXiaohua Zhai, Basil Mustafa, Alexander Kolesnikov, Lucas BeyerICCV 2023 · 2,932 citations
Related papers
- A Multimodal Automated Interpretability AgentTamar Rott Shaham, Sarah Schwettmann, Franklin Wang, Achyuta Rajaram et al.ICML 2024 · 57 citations
- REVISOR: Beyond Textual Reflection, Towards Multimodal Introspective Reasoning in Long-Form Video UnderstandingJiaze Li, Hao Yin, Wenhui Tan, Jingyang Chen et al.CVPR 2026 · 14 citations
- HiBug: On Human-Interpretable Model DebugMuxi Chen, Yu Li, Qiang XuNeurIPS 2023 · 22 citations
- Interpretable Composition Attribution Enhancement for Visio-linguistic Compositional UnderstandingWei Li, Zhen Huang, Xinmei Tian, Le Lu et al.EMNLP 2024
- Self-Prompting Analogical Reasoning for UAV Object DetectionNianxin Li, Mao Ye, Lihua Zhou, Song Tang et al.AAAI 2025 · 10 citations
