HiBug: On Human-Interpretable Model Debug
Muxi Chen, Yu Li, Qiang Xu
Abstract
Machine learning models can frequently produce systematic errors on critical subsets (or slices) of data that share common attributes. Discovering and explaining such model bugs is crucial for reliable model deployment. However, existing bug discovery and interpretation methods usually involve heavy human intervention and annotation, which can be cumbersome and have low bug coverage. In this paper, we propose HiBug , an automated framework for interpretable model debugging. Our approach utilizes large pre-trained models, such as chatGPT, to suggest human-understandable attributes that are related to the targeted computer vision tasks. By leveraging pre-trained vision-language models, we can efficiently identify common visual attributes of underperforming data slices using human-understandable terms. This enables us to uncover rare cases in the training data, identify spurious correlations in the model, and use the interpretable debug results to select or generate new training data for model improvement. Experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of the HiBug framework. Code is available at: https://github.com/cure-lab/HiBug .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8e3ff9a0-532b-496f-a7d8-840ad628c1fdCited by top-tier papers2
- FailureAtlas: Mapping the Failure Landscape of T2I Models via Active ExplorationMuxi Chen, Zhaohua Zhang, Chenchen Zhao, Mingyang Chen et al.CVPR 2026 · 2 citations
- HiBug2: Efficient and Interpretable Error Slice Discovery for Comprehensive Model DebuggingMuxi Chen, Chenchen Zhao, Qiang XuICLR 2025
Builds on9
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and GenerationJunnan Li, Dongxu Li, Caiming Xiong, Steven C. H. HoiICML 2022 · 6,549 citations
- DeepGini: prioritizing massive tests to enhance the robustness of deep neural networksYang Feng, Qingkai Shi, Xinyu Gao, Jun Wan et al.ISSTA 2020 · 206 citations
- Prioritizing Test Inputs for Deep Neural Networks via Mutation AnalysisZan Wang, Hanmo You, Junjie Chen, Yingyi Zhang et al.ICSE 2021 · 117 citations
Related papers
- How can Explainability Methods be Used to Support Bug Identification in Computer Vision Models?Agathe Balayn, Natasa Rikalo, Christoph Lofi, Jie Yang et al.CHI 2022 · 22 citations
- What Is Wrong with My Model? Identifying Systematic Problems with Semantic Data SlicingChenyang Yang, Yining Hong, Grace A. Lewis, Tongshuang Wu et al.ASE 2024 · 2 citations
- Understanding Bias in Large-Scale Visual DatasetsBoya Zeng, Yida Yin, Zhuang LiuNeurIPS 2024 · 23 citations
- A Multimodal Automated Interpretability AgentTamar Rott Shaham, Sarah Schwettmann, Franklin Wang, Achyuta Rajaram et al.ICML 2024 · 57 citations
- Automated Program Repair in the Era of Large Pre-trained Language ModelsChunqiu Steven Xia, Yuxiang Wei, Lingming ZhangICSE 2023 · 321 citations
