Interpretable Composition Attribution Enhancement for Visio-linguistic Compositional Understanding
Wei Li, Zhen Huang, Xinmei Tian, Le Lu, Houqiang Li, Xu Shen, Jieping Ye
Abstract
Contrastively trained vision-language models such as CLIP have achieved remarkable progress in vision and language representation learning. Despite the promising progress, their proficiency in compositional reasoning over attributes and relations (e.g., distinguishing between "the car is underneath the person" and "the person is underneath the car") remains notably inadequate. We investigate the cause for this deficient behavior is the composition attribution issue, where the attribution scores (e.g., attention scores or GradCAM scores) for relations (e.g., underneath) or attributes (e.g., red) in the text are substantially lower than those for object terms. In this work, we show such issue is mitigated via a novel framework called CAE (Composition Attribution Enhancement). This generic framework incorporates various interpretable attribution methods to encourage the model to pay greater attention to composition words denoting relationships and attributes within the text. Detailed analysis shows that our approach enables the models to adjust and rectify the attribution of the texts. Extensive experiments across seven benchmarks reveal that our framework significantly enhances the ability to discern intricate details and construct more sophisticated interpretations of combined visual and linguistic elements.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5e5a2f83-8918-4d41-808c-f1c3cfdced98Cited by top-tier papers3
- AmpleHate: Amplifying the Attention for Versatile Implicit Hate DetectionYejin Lee, Joonghyuk Hahn, Hyeseon Ahn, Yo-Sub HanEMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- Is CLIP Ideal? No. Can We Fix It? Yes!Raphi Kang, Yue Song, Georgia Gkioxari, Pietro PeronaICCV 2025 · 1 citation
- Cross-Modal Masked Compositional Concept Modeling for Enhancing Visio-Linguistic CompositionalityWei Li, Zhen Huang, Xinmei TianACL 2026
Builds on24
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot LearningJean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jeff Donahue, Pauline Luc, Antoine Miech et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 6,707 citations
- BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and GenerationJunnan Li, Dongxu Li, Caiming Xiong, Steven C. H. HoiICML 2022 · 6,549 citations
Related papers
- Contrasting Intra-Modal and Ranking Cross-Modal Hard Negatives to Enhance Visio-Linguistic Compositional UnderstandingLe Zhang, Rabiul Awal, Aishwarya AgrawalCVPR 2024 · 7 citations
- Coarse-to-Fine Contrastive Learning in Image-Text-Graph Space for Improved Vision-Language CompositionalityHarman Singh, Pengchuan Zhang, Qifan Wang, Mengjiao Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 10 citations
- Gradient-based Visual Explanation for Transformer-based CLIPChenyang Zhao, Kun Wang, Xingyu Zeng, Rui Zhao et al.ICML 2024 · 24 citations
- Dense and Aligned Captions (DAC) Promote Compositional Reasoning in VL ModelsSivan Doveh, Assaf Arbelle, Sivan Harary, Roei Herzig et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 93 citations
- Enhancing Compositional Reasoning in CLIP via Reconstruction and Alignment of Text DescriptionsJihoon Kwon, Kyle Min, Jy-yong SohnNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
