Correct-by-Construction: Certified Individual Fairness through Neural Network Training
Ruihan Zhang, Jun Sun
Abstract
Fairness in machine learning is more important than ever as ethical concerns continue to grow. Individual fairness demands that individuals differing only in sensitive attributes receive the same outcomes. However, commonly used machine learning algorithms often fail to achieve such fairness. To improve individual fairness, various training methods have been developed, such as incorporating fairness constraints as optimisation objectives. While these methods have demonstrated empirical effectiveness, they lack formal guarantees of fairness. Existing approaches that aim to provide fairness guarantees primarily rely on verification techniques, which can sometimes fail to produce definitive results. Moreover, verification alone does not actively enhance individual fairness during training. To address this limitation, we propose a novel framework that formally guarantees individual fairness throughout training. Our approach consists of two parts, i.e., (1) provably fair initialisation that ensures the model starts in a fair state, and (2) a fairness-preserving training algorithm that maintains fairness as the model learns. A key element of our method is the use of randomised response mechanisms, which protect sensitive attributes while maintaining fairness guarantees. We formally prove that this mechanism sustains individual fairness throughout the training process. Experimental evaluations confirm that our approach is effective, i.e., producing models that are empirically fair and accurate. Furthermore, our approach is much more efficient than the alternative approach based on certified training (which requires neural network verification during training).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ef77a3be-bdcc-48a1-9c65-6281a51969d1Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on20
- Formal Security Analysis of Neural Networks using Symbolic IntervalsShiqi Wang, Kexin Pei, Justin Whitehouse, Junfeng Yang et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 523 citations
- To be Robust or to be Fair: Towards Fairness in Adversarial TrainingHan Xu, Xiaorui Liu, Yaxin Li, Anil K. Jain et al.ICML 2021 · 218 citations
- White-box fairness testing through adversarial samplingPeixin Zhang, Jingyi Wang, Jun Sun, Guoliang Dong et al.ICSE 2020 · 127 citations
- Learning Certified Individually Fair RepresentationsAnian Ruoss, Mislav Balunovic, Marc Fischer, Martin T. VechevNeurIPS 2020 · 112 citations
- An Abstraction-Based Framework for Neural Network VerificationYizhak Yisrael Elboher, Justin Gottschlich, Guy KatzCAV 2020 · 97 citations
Related papers
- SenSeI: Sensitive Set Invariance for Enforcing Individual FairnessMikhail Yurochkin, Yuekai SunICLR 2021 · 53 citations
- Training individually fair ML models with sensitive subspace robustnessMikhail Yurochkin, Amanda Bower, Yuekai SunICLR 2020 · 123 citations
- CertiFair: A Framework for Certified Global Fairness of Neural NetworksHaitham Khedr, Yasser ShoukryAAAI 2023 · 26 citations
- Certification of Distributional Individual FairnessMatthew Wicker, Vihari Piratla, Adrian WellerNeurIPS 2023 · 2 citations
- Fairify: Fairness Verification of Neural NetworksSumon Biswas, Hridesh RajanICSE 2023 · 27 citations
