Beyond Independent Manipulation: Individual Fairness-aware Strategic Classification with Peer Imitation
Xinpeng Lv, Yunxin Mao, Renzhe Xu, Jinxuan Yang, Chunyuan Zheng, Yuanlong Chen, Wanrong Huang, Shaowu Yang, Wenjing Yang, Peng Cui, Xinwang Liu, Haotian Wang
Abstract
Strategic classification (SC) investigates scenarios where agents manipulate their features to obtain favorable decisions from predictive models. Existing fairness-aware SC approaches primarily focus on group fairness and typically assume that agents respond independently. However, when individual fairness is required, ensuring similar individuals receive similar outcomes, agents' manipulation becomes interdependent: an agent's preferred manipulation depends on the neighborhoods' outcomes. This induces a mismatch between classical SC formulations and fairness-aware decision settings, where independent models no longer accurately characterize strategic manipulations. To address this issue, we introduce individual fairness-aware strategic classification (IFSC), a framework that models peer-driven manipulation arising from individual fairness, where agents imitate nearby positively decided peers to obtain favorable outcomes. IFSC characterizes strategic manipulation as similarity-based imitation toward visible accepted peers and learns classifiers under the resulting post-manipulation distributions. To account for uncertainty in peer observability, IFSC employs a robust learning process that introduces stochastic perturbations during manipulation simulation. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that IFSC improves individual-fairness consistency and mitigates imitation-induced distortions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2b334b26-b40c-4bb5-9685-46584d60e6a5Builds on21
- Performative PredictionJuan C. Perdomo, Tijana Zrnic, Celestine Mendler-Dünner, Moritz HardtICML 2020 · 422 citations
- Strategic Classification is Causal Modeling in DisguiseJohn Miller, Smitha Milli, Moritz HardtICML 2020 · 127 citations
- Learning Strategy-Aware Linear ClassifiersYiling Chen, Yang Liu, Chara PodimataNeurIPS 2020 · 110 citations
- Two Simple Ways to Learn Individual Fairness Metrics from DataDebarghya Mukherjee, Mikhail Yurochkin, Moulinath Banerjee, Yuekai SunICML 2020 · 109 citations
- Causal Strategic Linear RegressionYonadav Shavit, Benjamin L. Edelman, Brian AxelrodICML 2020 · 91 citations
Related papers
- Individual Fairness In Strategic ClassificationZhiqun Zuo, Mohammad Mahdi KhaliliNeurIPS 2025
- Desirable Effort Fairness and Optimality Trade-offs in Strategic LearningValia Efthymiou, Ekaterina Fedorova, Chara PodimataICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Partial Fairness Awareness: Belief-Guided Strategic Mechanism for Strategic AgentsXinpeng Lv, Chunyuan Zheng, Yunxin Mao, Renzhe Xu et al.AAAI 2026
- Beyond Rational Illusion: Behaviorally Realistic Strategic ClassificationXinpeng Lv, Yunxin Mao, Renzhe Xu, Chunyuan Zheng et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Fairness Interventions as (Dis)Incentives for Strategic ManipulationXueru Zhang, Mohammad Mahdi Khalili, Kun Jin, Parinaz Naghizadeh et al.ICML 2022 · 27 citations
