Partial Fairness Awareness: Belief-Guided Strategic Mechanism for Strategic Agents
Xinpeng Lv, Chunyuan Zheng, Yunxin Mao, Renzhe Xu, Hao Zou, Shanzhi Gu, Liyang Xu, Huan Chen, Yuanlong Chen, Wenjing Yang, Haotian Wang
Abstract
Strategic machine learning investigates scenarios where agents manipulate their features to receive favorable decisions from predictive models. To address fairness concerns intrinsic to strategic classification, recent work has introduced group-specific fairness constraints. However, current fairness-aware approaches face a fundamental dilemma in the issue of fairness exposure: making these constraints public enables strategic manipulation and can lead to fairness reversal, while keeping them hidden may reduce social welfare and discourage genuine improvement. To fill this gap, we subsequently propose the problem of Partial Fairness Awareness (PFA), as our theoretical analysis informs that such a dilemma can be mitigated by releasing the candidate set of fairness constraints and concealing the grounding constraint. To be specific, we introduce a belief-guided strategic mechanism wherein agents iteratively interact with the decision system and maintain a belief distribution over the candidate set of fairness constraints. This belief-guided process enables agents, through iterative interaction and feedback, to update their belief distribution over the candidate set, thereby gradually aligning their belief with the grounding fairness constraint employed by the system. Extensive experiments on real-world and synthetic datasets demonstrate that PFA achieves lower group fairness gaps, higher acceptance of truly qualified individuals, and more stable outcomes compared to fully public or private fairness regimes.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext aa0a0cb6-6ff3-4172-b09d-b9a34ebe274cCited by top-tier papers3
- When Tabular Foundation Models Meet Strategic Tabular Data: A Prior Alignment ApproachXinpeng Lv, Yunxin Mao, Renzhe Xu, Chunyuan Zheng et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Beyond Rational Illusion: Behaviorally Realistic Strategic ClassificationXinpeng Lv, Yunxin Mao, Renzhe Xu, Chunyuan Zheng et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Beyond Independent Manipulation: Individual Fairness-aware Strategic Classification with Peer ImitationXinpeng Lv, Yunxin Mao, Renzhe Xu, Jinxuan Yang et al.KDD 2026
Builds on21
- Performative PredictionJuan C. Perdomo, Tijana Zrnic, Celestine Mendler-Dünner, Moritz HardtICML 2020 · 422 citations
- Strategic Classification is Causal Modeling in DisguiseJohn Miller, Smitha Milli, Moritz HardtICML 2020 · 127 citations
- Learning Strategy-Aware Linear ClassifiersYiling Chen, Yang Liu, Chara PodimataNeurIPS 2020 · 110 citations
- Causal Strategic Linear RegressionYonadav Shavit, Benjamin L. Edelman, Brian AxelrodICML 2020 · 91 citations
- Who Leads and Who Follows in Strategic Classification?Tijana Zrnic, Eric Mazumdar, S. Shankar Sastry, Michael I. JordanNeurIPS 2021 · 76 citations
Related papers
- Individual Fairness In Strategic ClassificationZhiqun Zuo, Mohammad Mahdi KhaliliNeurIPS 2025
- Desirable Effort Fairness and Optimality Trade-offs in Strategic LearningValia Efthymiou, Ekaterina Fedorova, Chara PodimataICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Bayesian Strategic ClassificationLee Cohen, Saeed Sharifi-Malvajerdi, Kevin Stangl, Ali Vakilian et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 18 citations
- Fairness Interventions as (Dis)Incentives for Strategic ManipulationXueru Zhang, Mohammad Mahdi Khalili, Kun Jin, Parinaz Naghizadeh et al.ICML 2022 · 27 citations
- Strategic Instrumental Variable Regression: Recovering Causal Relationships From Strategic ResponsesKeegan Harris, Dung Daniel T. Ngo, Logan Stapleton, Hoda Heidari et al.ICML 2022 · 37 citations
