Post-breach Recovery: Protection against White-box Adversarial Examples for Leaked DNN Models
Shawn Shan, Wenxin Ding, Emily Wenger, Haitao Zheng, Ben Y. Zhao
Abstract
Server breaches are an unfortunate reality on today's Internet. In the context of deep neural network (DNN) models, they are particularly harmful, because a leaked model gives an attacker "whitebox" access to generate adversarial examples, a threat model that has no practical robust defenses. For practitioners who have invested years and millions into proprietary DNNs, e.g. medical imaging, this seems like an inevitable disaster looming on the horizon. In this paper, we consider the problem of post-breach recovery for DNN models. We propose Neo, a new system that creates new versions of leaked models, alongside an inference time filter that detects and removes adversarial examples generated on previously leaked models. The classification surfaces of different model versions are slightly offset (by introducing hidden distributions), and Neo detects the overfitting of attacks to the leaked model used in its generation. We show that across a variety of tasks and attack methods, Neo is able to filter out attacks from leaked models with very high accuracy, and provides strong protection (7-10 recoveries) against attackers who repeatedly breach the server. Neo performs well against a variety of strong adaptive attacks, dropping slightly in # of breaches recoverable, and demonstrates potential as a complement to DNN defenses in the wild.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- "Get in Researchers; We're Measuring Reproducibility": A Reproducibility Study of Machine Learning Papers in Tier 1 Security ConferencesDaniel Olszewski, Allison Lu, Carson Stillman, Kevin Warren et al.CCS 2023 · 19 citations
- FaceObfuscator: Defending Deep Learning-based Privacy Attacks with Gradient Descent-resistant Features in Face RecognitionShuaifan Jin, He Wang, Zhibo Wang, Feng Xiao et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 9 citations
- Fight Fire with Fire: Combating Adversarial Patch Attacks using Pattern-randomized Defensive PatchesJianan Feng, Jiachun Li, Changqing Miao, Jianjun Huang et al.S&P 2025
- Glaze: Protecting Artists from Style Mimicry by Text-to-Image ModelsShawn Shan, Jenna Cryan, Emily Wenger, Haitao Zheng et al.USENIX Security 2023
- Enhance Stealthiness and Transferability of Adversarial Attacks with Class Activation Mapping Ensemble AttackHui Xia, Rui Zhang, Zi Kang, Shuliang Jiang et al.NDSS 2024
Builds on23
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural NetworksNicolas Papernot, Patrick D. McDaniel, Xi Wu, Somesh Jha et al.S&P 2016 · 3,275 citations
- Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingEric Wong, Leslie Rice, J. Zico KolterICLR 2020 · 1,352 citations
- MagNet: A Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial ExamplesDongyu Meng, Hao ChenCCS 2017 · 1,295 citations
- On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example DefensesFlorian Tramèr, Nicholas Carlini, Wieland Brendel, Aleksander MadryNeurIPS 2020 · 1,026 citations
Related papers
- Eliminating Adversarial Noise via Information Discard and Robust Representation RestorationDawei Zhou, Yukun Chen, Nannan Wang, Decheng Liu et al.ICML 2023 · 10 citations
- Defending Against Model Stealing Attacks With Adaptive MisinformationSanjay Kariyappa, Moinuddin K. QureshiCVPR 2020
- Prediction Poisoning: Towards Defenses Against DNN Model Stealing AttacksTribhuvanesh Orekondy, Bernt Schiele, Mario FritzICLR 2020 · 194 citations
- Adversarial Defense via Learning to Generate Diverse AttacksYunseok Jang, Tianchen Zhao, Seunghoon Hong, Honglak LeeICCV 2019 · 88 citations
- On Breaking Deep Generative Model-based Defenses and BeyondYanzhi Chen, Renjie Xie, Zhanxing ZhuICML 2020 · 4 citations
