Fight Fire with Fire: Combating Adversarial Patch Attacks using Pattern-randomized Defensive Patches
Jianan Feng, Jiachun Li, Changqing Miao, Jianjun Huang, Wei You, Wenchang Shi, Bin Liang
Abstract
Object detection has found extensive applications in various tasks, but it is also susceptible to adversarial patch attacks. The ideal defense should be effective, efficient, easy to deploy, and capable of withstanding adaptive attacks. In this paper, we adopt a counterattack strategy to propose a novel and general methodology for defending adversarial attacks. Two types of defensive patches, canary and woodpecker, are specially-crafted and injected into the model input to proactively probe or counteract potential adversarial patches. In this manner, adversarial patch attacks can be effectively detected by simply analyzing the model output, without the need to alter the target model. Moreover, we employ randomized canary and woodpecker injection patterns to defend against defense-aware attacks. The effectiveness and practicality of the proposed method are demonstrated through comprehensive experiments. The results illustrate that canary and woodpecker achieve high performance, even when confronted with unknown attack methods, while incurring limited time overhead. Furthermore, our method also exhibits sufficient robustness against defense-aware attacks, as evidenced by adaptive attack experiments.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0a6adf81-3ff7-40cb-b083-6f7061767df0Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on33
- On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example DefensesFlorian Tramèr, Nicholas Carlini, Wieland Brendel, Aleksander MadryNeurIPS 2020 · 1,026 citations
- Adversarial Sensor Attack on LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous DrivingYulong Cao, Chaowei Xiao, Benjamin Cyr, Yimeng Zhou et al.CCS 2019 · 626 citations
- Why Do Adversarial Attacks Transfer? Explaining Transferability of Evasion and Poisoning AttacksAmbra Demontis, Marco Melis, Maura Pintor, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 466 citations
- Privacy Risks of Securing Machine Learning Models against Adversarial ExamplesLiwei Song, Reza Shokri, Prateek MittalCCS 2019 · 293 citations
- Naturalistic Physical Adversarial Patch for Object DetectorsYu-Chih-Tuan Hu, Jun-Cheng Chen, Bo-Han Kung, Kai-Lung Hua et al.ICCV 2021 · 224 citations
Related papers
- Defending Physical Adversarial Attack on Object Detection via Adversarial Patch-Feature EnergyTaeheon Kim, Youngjoon Yu, Yong Man RoACM MM 2022 · 19 citations
- Segment and Complete: Defending Object Detectors against Adversarial Patch Attacks with Robust Patch DetectionJiang Liu, Alexander Levine, Chun Pong Lau, Rama Chellappa et al.CVPR 2022 · 99 citations
- AntiStyler: Defending Object Detection Models Against Adversarial Patch Attacks Using Style RemovalIdan Yankelev, Edita Grolman, Yarin Yerushalmi Levi, Amit Giloni et al.CVPR 2026 · 1 citation
- I Don't Know You, But I Can Catch You: Real-Time Defense against Diverse Adversarial Patches for Object DetectorsZijin Lin, Yue Zhao, Kai Chen, Jinwen HeCCS 2024 · 4 citations
- Revisiting Adversarial Patch Defenses on Object Detectors: Unified Evaluation, Large-Scale Dataset, and New InsightsJunhao Zheng, Jiahao Sun, Chenhao Lin, Zhengyu Zhao et al.ICCV 2025 · 4 citations
