Privacy Risks of Securing Machine Learning Models against Adversarial Examples
Liwei Song, Reza Shokri, Prateek Mittal
Abstract
The arms race between attacks and defenses for machine learning models has come to a forefront in recent years, in both the security community and the privacy community. However, one big limitation of previous research is that the security domain and the privacy domain have typically been considered separately. It is thus unclear whether the defense methods in one domain will have any unexpected impact on the other domain. In this paper, we take a step towards resolving this limitation by combining the two domains. In particular, we measure the success of membership inference attacks against six state-of-the-art defense methods that mitigate the risk of adversarial examples (i.e., evasion attacks). Membership inference attacks determine whether or not an individual data record has been part of a model's training set. The accuracy of such attacks reflects the information leakage of training algorithms about individual members of the training set. Adversarial defense methods against adversarial examples influence the model's decision boundaries such that model predictions remain unchanged for a small area around each input. However, this objective is optimized on training data. Thus, individual data records in the training set have a significant influence on robust models. This makes the models more vulnerable to inference attacks. To perform the membership inference attacks, we leverage the existing inference methods that exploit model predictions. We also propose two new inference methods that exploit structural properties of robust models on adversarially perturbed data. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that compared with the natural training (undefended) approach, adversarial defense methods can indeed increase the target model's risk against membership inference attacks. When using adversarial defenses to train the robust models, the membership inference advantage increases by up to 4.5 times compared to the naturally undefended models. Beyond revealing the privacy risks of adversarial defenses, we further investigate the factors, such as model capacity, that influence the membership information leakage. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Software and application security; • Computing methodologies → Neural networks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fba1eedb-75b0-4361-ae5c-06f2ebb7c7a6Cited by top-tier papers67
- Membership Inference Attacks From First PrinciplesNicholas Carlini, Steve Chien, Milad Nasr, Shuang Song et al.S&P 2022 · 1,049 citations
- Label-Only Membership Inference AttacksChristopher A. Choquette-Choo, Florian Tramèr, Nicholas Carlini, Nicolas PapernotICML 2021 · 628 citations
- Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning ModelsLiwei Song, Prateek MittalUSENIX Security 2021 · 483 citations
- MemGuard: Defending against Black-Box Membership Inference Attacks via Adversarial ExamplesJinyuan Jia, Ahmed Salem, Michael Backes, Yang Zhang et al.CCS 2019 · 464 citations
- Data Augmentation Can Improve RobustnessSylvestre-Alvise Rebuffi, Sven Gowal, Dan Andrei Calian, Florian Stimberg et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 427 citations
Builds on13
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIsFlorian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Reiter et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 2,088 citations
- Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated LearningMilad Nasr, Reza Shokri, Amir HoumansadrS&P 2019 · 1,778 citations
Related papers
- Membership Leakage in Label-Only ExposuresZheng Li, Yang ZhangCCS 2021 · 185 citations
- Please Tell Me More: Privacy Impact of Explainability through the Lens of Membership Inference AttackHan Liu, Yuhao Wu, Zhiyuan Yu, Ning ZhangS&P 2024 · 52 citations
- Membership Privacy for Machine Learning Models Through Knowledge TransferVirat Shejwalkar, Amir HoumansadrAAAI 2021 · 130 citations
- ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning ModelsAhmed Salem, Yang Zhang, Mathias Humbert, Pascal Berrang et al.NDSS 2019 · 1,141 citations
- A Unified Defense Framework Against Membership Inference in Federated Learning via Distillation and Contribution-Aware AggregationLiwei Zhang, Linghui Li, Xiaotian Si, Ziduo Guo et al.NDSS 2026 · 1 citation
