Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustness
Sylvestre-Alvise Rebuffi, Sven Gowal, Dan Andrei Calian, Florian Stimberg, Olivia Wiles, Timothy A. Mann
Abstract
Adversarial training suffers from robust overfitting, a phenomenon where the robust test accuracy starts to decrease during training. In this paper, we focus on reducing robust overfitting by using common data augmentation schemes. We demonstrate that, contrary to previous findings, when combined with model weight averaging, data augmentation can significantly boost robust accuracy. Furthermore, we compare various augmentations techniques and observe that spatial composition techniques work the best for adversarial training. Finally, we evaluate our approach on CIFAR-10 against and norm-bounded perturbations of size and , respectively. We show large absolute improvements of +2.93% and +2.16% in robust accuracy compared to previous state-of-the-art methods. In particular, against norm-bounded perturbations of size , our model reaches 60.07% robust accuracy without using any external data. We also achieve a significant performance boost with this approach while using other architectures and datasets such as CIFAR-100, SVHN and TinyImageNet.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext eff4406a-4a7b-4f94-bea4-0149d88d9168Cited by top-tier papers79
- Cross-Entropy Loss Functions: Theoretical Analysis and ApplicationsAnqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongICML 2023 · 790 citations
- Revisiting Adversarial Training for ImageNet: Architectures, Training and Generalization across Threat ModelsNaman Deep Singh, Francesco Croce, Matthias HeinNeurIPS 2023 · 119 citations
- Robust Evaluation of Diffusion-Based Adversarial PurificationMinjong Lee, Dongwoo KimICCV 2023 · 96 citations
- Efficient and Effective Augmentation Strategy for Adversarial TrainingSravanti Addepalli, Samyak Jain, Venkatesh Babu R.NeurIPS 2022 · 77 citations
- DriveSuprim: Towards Precise Trajectory Selection for End-to-End PlanningWenhao Yao, Zhenxin Li, Shiyi Lan, Zi Wang et al.AAAI 2026 · 46 citations
Builds on12
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- RandAugment: Practical Automated Data Augmentation with a Reduced Search SpaceEkin Dogus Cubuk, Barret Zoph, Jonathon Shlens, Quoc LeNeurIPS 2020 · 4,453 citations
- Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural NetworksNicolas Papernot, Patrick D. McDaniel, Xi Wu, Somesh Jha et al.S&P 2016 · 3,275 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningLeslie Rice, Eric Wong, J. Zico KolterICML 2020 · 935 citations
Related papers
- Improving Robustness using Generated DataSven Gowal, Sylvestre-Alvise Rebuffi, Olivia Wiles, Florian Stimberg et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 384 citations
- Data augmentation alone can improve adversarial trainingLin Li, Michael W. SpratlingICLR 2023 · 9 citations
- Consistency Regularization for Adversarial RobustnessJihoon Tack, Sihyun Yu, Jongheon Jeong, Minseon Kim et al.AAAI 2022 · 75 citations
- Robust Overfitting may be mitigated by properly learned smootheningTianlong Chen, Zhenyu Zhang, Sijia Liu, Shiyu Chang et al.ICLR 2021 · 69 citations
- Stability Analysis and Generalization Bounds of Adversarial TrainingJiancong Xiao, Yanbo Fan, Ruoyu Sun, Jue Wang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 49 citations
