Quadratic Lower Bounds on the Approximate Stabilizer Rank: A Probabilistic Approach
Saeed Mehraban, Mehrdad Tahmasbi
Abstract
The approximate stabilizer rank of a quantum state is the minimum number of terms in any approximate decomposition of that state into stabilizer states. Bravyi and Gosset [BG16] showed that the approximate stabilizer rank of a so-called "magic" state like |T ⊗n , up to polynomial factors, is an upper bound on the number of classical operations required to simulate an arbitrary quantum circuit with Clifford gates and n number of T gates. As a result, an exponential lower bound on this quantity seems inevitable. Despite this intuition, several attempts using various techniques could not lead to a better than a linear lower bound on the "exact" rank of |T ⊗n , meaning the minimal size of a decomposition that exactly produces the state. For the "approximate" rank, which is more realistically related to the cost of simulating quantum circuits, no lower bound better than Ω(
n) has been known [PSV22, LS22]. In this paper, we improve the lower bound on the approximate rank to Ω(n 2 ) for a wide range of the approximation parameters. An immediate corollary of our result is the existence of polynomial time computable functions which require a super-linear number of terms in any decomposition into exponentials of quadratic forms over F2, resolving a question of [Wil18]. Our approach is based on a strong lower bound on the approximate rank of a quantum state sampled from the Haar measure, a step-by-step analysis of the approximate rank of a magic-state teleportation protocol to sample from the Haar measure, and a result about trading Clifford operations with T gates by [LKS18].
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e7ae8d42-f287-429d-9e57-4c9f51281d94Cited by top-tier papers4
- Learning Stabilizer Structure of Quantum StatesSrinivasan Arunachalam, Arkopal DuttSTOC 2026 · 5 citations
- Polynomial-Time Tolerant Testing Stabilizer StatesSrinivasan Arunachalam, Arkopal DuttSTOC 2025 · 4 citations
- Improved Bounds for Testing Low Stabilizer Complexity StatesSaeed Mehraban, Mehrdad TahmasbiSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
- Quantum State Preparation with Optimal T-CountDavid Gosset, Robin Kothari, Kewen WuSODA 2026 · 1 citation
Related papers
- Single-Copy Stabilizer TestingMarcel Hinsche, Jonas HelsenSTOC 2025 · 3 citations
- Quantum Circuit Lower Bounds in the Magic HierarchyNatalie ParhamSTOC 2026 · 15 citations
- Improved Stabilizer Estimation via Bell Difference SamplingSabee Grewal, Vishnu Iyer, William Kretschmer, Daniel LiangSTOC 2024 · 20 citations
- Improved Lower Bounds for QAC0Malvika Raj Joshi, Avishay Tal, Francisca Vasconcelos, John WrightSTOC 2026 · 4 citations
- Simulating Quantum Circuits by Model CountingJingyi Mei, Marcello M. Bonsangue, Alfons LaarmanCAV 2024 · 15 citations
