Truth over Tricks: Measuring and Mitigating Shortcut Learning in Misinformation Detection
Herun Wan, Jiaying Wu, Minnan Luo, Zhi Zeng, Zhixiong Su
Abstract
Misinformation detection models often rely on superficial cues (i.e., shortcuts) that correlate with misinformation in training data but fail to generalize to the diverse and evolving nature of real-world misinformation. This issue is exacerbated by large language models (LLMs), which can easily generate convincing misinformation through simple prompts. We introduce TruthOverTricks, a unified evaluation paradigm for measuring shortcut learning in misinformation detection. TruthOverTricks categorizes shortcut behaviors into intrinsic shortcut induction and extrinsic shortcut injection, and evaluates seven representative detectors across 14 popular benchmarks, along with two new factual misinformation datasets, NQ-Misinfo and Streaming-Misinfo. Empirical results reveal that existing detectors suffer severe performance degradation when exposed to both naturally occurring and adversarially crafted shortcuts. To address this, we propose SMF, an LLM-augmented data augmentation framework that mitigates shortcut reliance through paraphrasing, factual summarization, and sentiment normalization. SMF consistently enhances robustness across 16 benchmarks, encouraging models to rely on deeper semantic understanding rather than shortcut cues. To promote the development of misinformation detectors, we have published the resources publicly at https://github.com/whr000001/TruthOverTricks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e79cc1c6-cb32-49dd-be13-464378dcaa60Cited by top-tier papers3
- Beyond the Crowd: LLM-Augmented Community Notes for Governing Health MisinformationJiaying Wu, Zihang Fu, Haonan Wang, Fanxiao Li et al.ACL 2026 · 17 citations
- From Manipulation to Mistrust: Explaining Diverse Micro-Video Misinformation for Robust Debunking in the WildZhi Zeng, Yifei Yang, Jiaying Wu, Xulang Zhang et al.WWW 2026 · 3 citations
- Bot Meets Shortcut: How Can LLMs Aid in Handling Unknown Invariance OOD Scenarios?Shiyan Zheng, Herun Wan, Minnan Luo, Junhang HuangAAAI 2026
Builds on29
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Deberta: decoding-Enhanced Bert with Disentangled AttentionPengcheng He, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, Weizhu ChenICLR 2021 · 3,729 citations
- DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability CurvatureEric Mitchell, Yoonho Lee, Alexander Khazatsky, Christopher D. Manning et al.ICML 2023 · 988 citations
- Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability CurvatureGuangsheng Bao, Yanbin Zhao, Zhiyang Teng, Linyi Yang et al.ICLR 2024 · 311 citations
- Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?Canyu Chen, Kai ShuICLR 2024 · 270 citations
Related papers
- TripleFact: Defending Data Contamination in the Evaluation of LLM-driven Fake News DetectionCheng Xu, Nan YanACL 2025
- SummEdits: Measuring LLM Ability at Factual Reasoning Through The Lens of SummarizationPhilippe Laban, Wojciech Kryscinski, Divyansh Agarwal, Alexander R. Fabbri et al.EMNLP 2023 · 29 citations
- Do LLMs Overcome Shortcut Learning? An Evaluation of Shortcut Challenges in Large Language ModelsYu Yuan, Lili Zhao, Kai Zhang, Guangting Zheng et al.EMNLP 2024 · 4 citations
- How does Misinformation Affect Large Language Model Behaviors and Preferences?Miao Peng, Nuo Chen, Jianheng Tang, Jia LiACL 2025 · 2 citations
- Can Global XAI Methods Reveal Injected Behaviours in LLMs? SHAP vs Rule Extraction vs RuleSHAPFrancesco SovranoKDD 2026 · 5 citations
