Bot Meets Shortcut: How Can LLMs Aid in Handling Unknown Invariance OOD Scenarios?
Shiyan Zheng, Herun Wan, Minnan Luo, Junhang Huang
Abstract
While existing social bot detectors perform well on benchmarks, their robustness across diverse real-world scenarios remains limited due to unclear ground truth and varied misleading cues. In particular, the impact of shortcut learning, where models rely on spurious correlations instead of capturing causal task-relevant features, has received limited attention. To address this gap, we conduct an in-depth study to assess how detectors are influenced by potential shortcuts based on textual features, which are most susceptible to manipulation by social bots. We design a series of shortcut scenarios by constructing spurious associations between user labels and superficial textual cues to evaluate model robustness. Results show that shifts in irrelevant feature distributions significantly degrade social bot detector performance, with an average relative accuracy drop of 32% in the baseline models. To tackle this challenge, we propose mitigation strategies based on large language models, leveraging counterfactual data augmentation. These methods mitigate the problem from data and model perspectives across three levels, including data distribution at both the individual user text and overall dataset levels, as well as the model's ability to extract causal information. Our strategies achieve an average relative performance improvement of 56% under shortcut scenarios.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d072fda3-22ad-4640-beaf-b32cc698fedbBuilds on18
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- Learning The Difference That Makes A Difference With Counterfactually-Augmented DataDivyansh Kaushik, Eduard H. Hovy, Zachary Chase LiptonICLR 2020 · 625 citations
- Scalable and Generalizable Social Bot Detection through Data SelectionKai-Cheng Yang, Onur Varol, Pik-Mai Hui, Filippo MenczerAAAI 2020 · 385 citations
- Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?David Cheng-Han Chiang, Hung-yi LeeACL 2023 · 254 citations
- Learning Causally Invariant Representations for Out-of-Distribution Generalization on GraphsYongqiang Chen, Yonggang Zhang, Yatao Bian, Han Yang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 246 citations
Related papers
- Truth over Tricks: Measuring and Mitigating Shortcut Learning in Misinformation DetectionHerun Wan, Jiaying Wu, Minnan Luo, Zhi Zeng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- What Does the Bot Say? Opportunities and Risks of Large Language Models in Social Media Bot DetectionShangbin Feng, Herun Wan, Ningnan Wang, Zhaoxuan Tan et al.ACL 2024 · 19 citations
- Large Language Model (LLM)-driven Adversarial Social Influences in Online Information Spread: Risks and InterventionsZhuoran Lu, Gionnieve Lim, Ming YinCHI 2026
- Dually Self-Improved Counterfactual Data Augmentation Using Large Language ModelLuhao Zhang, Xinyu Zhang, Linmei Hu, Dandan Song et al.ACL 2025 · 1 citation
- On the Risk of Evidence Pollution for Malicious Social Text Detection in the Era of LLMsHerun Wan, Minnan Luo, Zhixiong Su, Guang Dai et al.ACL 2025 · 5 citations
