LogicReward: Incentivizing LLM Reasoning via Step-Wise Logical Supervision
Jundong Xu, Hao (Scofield) Fei, Huichi Zhou, Xin Quan, Qijun Huang, Shengqiong Wu, William Yang Wang, Mong-Li Lee, Wynne Hsu
Abstract
Although LLMs exhibit strong reasoning capabilities, existing training methods largely depend on outcome-based feedback, which can produce correct answers with flawed reasoning. Prior work introduces supervision on intermediate steps but still lacks guarantees of logical soundness, which is crucial in high-stakes scenarios where logical consistency is paramount. To address this, we propose LogicReward, a novel reward system that guides model training by enforcing step-level logical correctness with a theorem prover. We further introduce Autoformalization with Soft Unification, which reduces natural language ambiguity and improves formalization quality, enabling more effective use of the theorem prover. An 8B model trained on data constructed with LogicReward surpasses GPT-4o and o4-mini by 11.6% and 2% on natural language inference and logical reasoning tasks with simple training procedures. Further analysis shows that LogicReward enhances reasoning faithfulness, improves generalizability to unseen tasks such as math and commonsense reasoning, and provides a reliable reward signal even without ground-truth labels. The code and data are available at https://llm-symbol.github.io/LogicReward.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e718308a-c29b-42e4-8dad-12459cd8937eCited by top-tier papers3
- LogiConBench: Benchmarking Logical Consistencies of LLMsZheng Chen, Chuan Zhou, Fengxiang Cheng, Tin Po Yip et al.ICLR 2026
- MAD-Logic: Multi-Agent Debate Enhances Symbolic Translation and ReasoningHaocheng Yang, Fengxiang Cheng, Tianjun Yao, Mengyue Yang et al.ICLR 2026
- SymDiag: Explainable Diagnosis for LLM Reasoning via Neuro-Symbolic VerificationWenyao Cui, Huaping Zhang, Yongyi Huang, Qiuchi Li et al.KDD 2026
Builds on29
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
Related papers
- Pushing the Boundaries of Natural Reasoning: Interleaved Bonus from Formal-Logic VerificationChuxue Cao, Jinluan Yang, Haoran Li, Kunhao Pan et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- RM-R1: Reward Modeling as ReasoningXiusi Chen, Gaotang Li, Ziqi Wang, Bowen Jin et al.ICLR 2026 · 147 citations
- Self-Consistency Preference OptimizationArchiki Prasad, Weizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Jing Xu et al.ICML 2025
- Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token PredictionLunjun Zhang, Arian Hosseini, Hritik Bansal, Mehran Kazemi et al.ICLR 2025
- Rectifying LLM Thought from Lens of OptimizationJunnan Liu, Hongwei Liu, Songyang Zhang, Kai ChenICLR 2026 · 3 citations
