Self-Consistency Preference Optimization
Archiki Prasad, Weizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Jing Xu, Maryam Fazel-Zarandi, Mohit Bansal, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Jason E. Weston, Jane Yu
Abstract
Self-alignment, whereby models learn to improve themselves without human annotation, is a rapidly growing research area. However, existing techniques often fail to improve complex reasoning tasks due to the difficulty of assigning correct rewards. An orthogonal approach that is known to improve correctness is self-consistency, a method applied at inference time based on multiple sampling in order to find the most consistent answer. In this work, we extend the selfconsistency concept to help train models. We thus introduce self-consistency preference optimization (SCPO), which iteratively trains consistent answers to be preferred over inconsistent ones on unsupervised new problems. We show SCPO leads to large improvements over conventional reward model training on reasoning tasks such as GSM8K and MATH, closing the gap with supervised training with gold answers or preferences, and that combining SCPO with standard supervised learning improves results even further. On ZebraLogic, SCPO finetunes Llama-3 8B to be superior to Llama-3 70B, Gemma-2 27B, and Claude-3 Haiku.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers33
- TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement LearningYuxin Zuo, Kaiyan Zhang, Li Sheng, Shang Qu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 249 citations
- R-Zero: Self-Evolving Reasoning LLM from Zero DataChengsong Huang, Wenhao Yu, Xiaoyang Wang, Hongming Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 220 citations
- Reasoning with Exploration: An Entropy PerspectiveDaixuan Cheng, Shaohan Huang, Xuekai Zhu, Bo Dai et al.AAAI 2026 · 216 citations
- Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI SynergyChris Yuhao Liu, Liang Zeng, Yuzhen Xiao, Jujie He et al.ICLR 2026 · 211 citations
- Self-Adapting Language ModelsAdam Zweiger, Jyothish Pari, Han Guo, Yoon Kim et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 78 citations
Builds on18
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With ReasoningEric Zelikman, Yuhuai Wu, Jesse Mu, Noah D. GoodmanNeurIPS 2022 · 1,126 citations
- Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMsMiao Xiong, Zhiyuan Hu, Xinyang Lu, Yifei Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 867 citations
Related papers
- Expectation Preference Optimization: Reliable Preference Estimation for Improving the Reasoning Capability of Large Language ModelsZelin Li, Dawei SongEMNLP 2025
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- The First Few Tokens Are All You Need: An Efficient and Effective Unsupervised Prefix Fine-Tuning Method for Reasoning ModelsKe Ji, Jiahao Xu, Tian Liang, Qiuzhi Liu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 33 citations
- Beyond Pairwise: Empowering LLM Alignment With (Ranked) Choice ModelingYuxuan Tang, Yifan FengICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Large Language Models Can Self-ImproveJiaxin Huang, Shixiang Gu, Le Hou, Yuexin Wu et al.EMNLP 2023 · 184 citations
