Open-Ended Instruction Realization with LLM-Enabled Multi-Planner Scheduling in Autonomous Vehicles
Jiawei Liu, Xun Gong, Fen Fang, Muli Yang, Bohao Qu, Yunfeng Hu, Hong Chen, Xulei Yang, Qing Guo
Abstract
Most Human-Machine Interaction (HMI) research overlooks the maneuvering needs of passengers in autonomous driving (AD). Natural language offers an intuitive interface, yet translating passenger open-ended instructions into control signals, without sacrificing interpretability and traceability, remains a challenge. This study proposes an instruction-realization framework that leverages a large language model (LLM) to interpret instructions, generates executable scripts that schedule multiple model predictive control (MPC)-based motion planners based on real-time feedback, and converts planned trajectories into control signals. This scheduling-centric design decouples semantic reasoning from vehicle control at different timescales, establishing a transparent, traceable decision-making chain from high-level instructions to low-level actions. Due to the absence of high-fidelity evaluation tools, this study introduces a benchmark for open-ended instruction realization in a closed-loop setting. Comprehensive experiments reveal that the framework significantly improves task-completion rates over instruction-realization baselines, reduces LLM query costs, achieves safety and compliance on par with specialized AD approaches, and exhibits considerable tolerance to LLM inference latency. For more qualitative illustrations and a clearer understanding.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e6eb716a-7871-4202-b0a2-3819e4ab933dCited by top-tier papers2
- EvoCF: Multi-Agent Collaboration via Agentic Memory-Driven Evolutionary Counterfactual PlanningHaotian Chi, Zeyu Feng, Xingrui Yu, Linbo Luo et al.ICML 2026
- From Language to Driving: A Dual-Loop SLM-Enhanced Framework for Multi-Planner Scheduling via a Domain-Specific LanguageJiawei Liu, Xun Gong, Muli Yang, Xingrui Yu et al.ACL 2026
Builds on9
- LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own GenerationsArjun Panickssery, Samuel R. Bowman, Shi FengNeurIPS 2024 · 865 citations
- Are Language Models Actually Useful for Time Series Forecasting?Mingtian Tan, Mike A. Merrill, Vinayak Gupta, Tim Althoff et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 326 citations
- AutoVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model for End-to-End Autonomous Driving with Adaptive Reasoning and Reinforcement Fine-TuningZewei Zhou, Tianhui Cai, Seth Z. Zhao, Yun Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 310 citations
- DiLu: A Knowledge-Driven Approach to Autonomous Driving with Large Language ModelsLicheng Wen, Daocheng Fu, Xin Li, Xinyu Cai et al.ICLR 2024 · 255 citations
- Deep Open Intent Classification with Adaptive Decision BoundaryHanlei Zhang, Hua Xu, Ting-En LinAAAI 2021 · 127 citations
Related papers
- LaMPilot: An Open Benchmark Dataset for Autonomous Driving with Language Model ProgramsYunsheng Ma, Can Cui, Xu Cao, Wenqian Ye et al.CVPR 2024 · 39 citations
- LMDrive: Closed-Loop End-to-End Driving with Large Language ModelsHao Shao, Yuxuan Hu, Letian Wang, Guanglu Song et al.CVPR 2024 · 114 citations
- Exploring LLMs for Generating Communicational Actions of External Interfaces on Autonomous VehiclesXinyue Gui, Ding Xia, Mark Colley, Stela Hanbyeol Seo et al.UbiComp 2026
- Driving with Advice: Large Model as Motion Advisor for Joint PlanningJunyin Wang, Jinlei Yu, Hao Lin, Huikai Liu et al.AAAI 2026
- VLMPlanner: Integrating Visual Language Models with Motion PlanningZhipeng Tang, Sha Zhang, Jiajun Deng, Chenjie Wang et al.ACM MM 2025 · 2 citations
