Black Swan: Abductive and Defeasible Video Reasoning in Unpredictable Events
Aditya Chinchure, Sahithya Ravi, Raymond T. Ng, Vered Shwartz, Boyang Li, Leonid Sigal
Abstract
The commonsense reasoning capabilities of visionlanguage models (VLMs), especially in abductive reasoning and defeasible reasoning, remain poorly understood. Most benchmarks focus on typical visual scenarios [1, 23, 42] , making it difficult to discern whether model performance stems from keen perception and reasoning skills, or reliance on pure statistical recall. We argue that by focusing on atypical events in videos, clearer insights can be gained on the core capabilities of VLMs. Explaining and understanding such out-of-distribution events requires models to extend beyond basic pattern recognition and regurgitation of their prior knowledge. To this end, we introduce Black-SwanSuite, a benchmark for evaluating VLMs' ability to reason about unexpected events through abductive and defeasible tasks. Our tasks artificially limit the amount of visual information provided to models while questioning them about hidden unexpected events, or provide new visual information that could change an existing hypothesis about the event. We curate a comprehensive benchmark suite comprising over 3,800 MCQ, 4,900 generative and 6,700 yes/no questions, spanning 1,655 videos. After extensively evaluating various state-of-the-art VLMs, including GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro, as well as open-source VLMs such as LLaVA-Video, we find significant performance gaps of up to 32% from humans on these tasks. Our findings reveal key limitations in current VLMs, emphasizing the need for enhanced model architectures and training strategies. Our data and leaderboard is available at https://blackswan.cs.ubc.ca .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e6761b2e-6796-42b1-b173-d6b2108c414dCited by top-tier papers2
- AbductiveMLLM: Boosting Visual Abductive Reasoning Within MLLMsBoyu Chang, Qi Wang, Xi Guo, Zhixiong Nan et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- SPIKE-RL: Video-LLMs meet Bayesian SurpriseSahithya Ravi, Aditya Chinchure, Raymond T. Ng, Leonid Sigal et al.ICLR 2026
Builds on15
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- CLEVRER: Collision Events for Video Representation and ReasoningKexin Yi, Chuang Gan, Yunzhu Li, Pushmeet Kohli et al.ICLR 2020 · 584 citations
- Abductive Commonsense ReasoningChandra Bhagavatula, Ronan Le Bras, Chaitanya Malaviya, Keisuke Sakaguchi et al.ICLR 2020 · 521 citations
- Visual Abductive ReasoningChen Liang, Wenguan Wang, Tianfei Zhou, Yi YangCVPR 2022 · 50 citations
Related papers
- VLMs have Tunnel Vision: Evaluating Nonlocal Visual Reasoning in Leading VLMsShmuel Berman, Jia DengNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- VideoReasonBench: Can MLLMs Perform Vision-Centric Complex Video Reasoning?Yuanxin Liu, Kun Ouyang, Haoning Wu, Yi Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 20 citations
- SciVideoBench: Benchmarking Scientific Video Reasoning in Large Multimodal ModelsAndong Deng, Taojiannan Yang, Shoubin Yu, Lincoln Spencer et al.ICML 2026 · 7 citations
- VisRes Bench: On Evaluating the Visual Reasoning Capabilities of VLMsBrigitta Malagurski Törtei, Yasser Dahou, Ngoc Dung Huynh, Wamiq Reyaz Para et al.CVPR 2026 · 3 citations
- Caption This, Reason That: VLMs Caught in the MiddleZihan Weng, Lucas Gomez, Taylor W. Webb, Pouya BashivanNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
