Importance-Aware Data Selection for Efficient LLM Instruction Tuning
Tingyu Jiang, Shen Li, Yiyao Song, Lan Zhang, Hualei Zhu, Yuan Zhao, Xiaohang Xu, Kenjiro Taura, Hao Henry Wang
Abstract
Instruction tuning plays a critical role in enhancing the performance and efficiency of Large Language Models (LLMs). Its success depends not only on the quality of the instruction data but also on the inherent capabilities of the LLM itself. Some studies suggest that even a small amount of high-quality data can achieve instruction fine-tuning results that are on par with, or even exceed, those from using a full-scale dataset. However, rather than focusing solely on calculating data quality scores to evaluate instruction data, there is a growing need to select high-quality data that maximally enhances the performance of instruction tuning for a given LLM. In this paper, we propose the Model Instruction Weakness Value (MIWV) as a novel metric to quantify the importance of instruction data in enhancing model's capabilities. The MIWV metric is derived from the discrepancies in the model’s responses when using In-Context Learning (ICL), helping identify the most beneficial data for enhancing instruction tuning performance. Our experimental results demonstrate that selecting only the top 1% of data based on MIWV can outperform training on the full dataset. Furthermore, this approach extends beyond existing research that focuses on data quality scoring for data selection, offering strong empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of our proposed method.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e5cde6ec-652e-4b79-8b47-694ea6ee18f0Cited by top-tier papers2
- AIR: Post-training Data Selection for Reasoning via Attention Head InfluenceJinrui Liu, Kai Hua, Xuanguang Pan, Ge Zhang et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Token-Efficient Long-Term Interest Sketching and Internalized Reasoning for LLM-based RecommendationZhihao Ding, Jinming Li, Shuai Mu, Jieming ShiICLR 2026
Builds on21
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,486 citations
- AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human FeedbackYann Dubois, Chen Xuechen Li, Rohan Taori, Tianyi Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 948 citations
- The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction TuningShayne Longpre, Le Hou, Tu Vu, Albert Webson et al.ICML 2023 · 908 citations
Related papers
- T-SHIRT: Token-Selective Hierarchical Data Selection for Instruction TuningYanjun Fu, Faisal Hamman, Sanghamitra DuttaNeurIPS 2025 · 15 citations
- From Selection to Refinement: Iterative Optimization for Instruction DataHang Hu, Ziyan Liu, Rujie Wen, Ruihui Hou et al.ACL 2026
- Less is More: High-value Data Selection for Visual Instruction TuningZikang Liu, Kun Zhou, Wayne Xin Zhao, Dawei Gao et al.ACM MM 2025 · 3 citations
- What Makes Good Instruction-Tuning Data? An In-Context Learning PerspectiveGuangzeng Han, Xiaolei HuangACL 2026 · 1 citation
- BRIEF: Bi-level Coreset Selection for Efficient Instruction Tuning in LLMsChaoyuan Shen, Chi Zhang, Chengliang Chai, Jiacheng Wang et al.VLDB 2026 · 2 citations
