T-SHIRT: Token-Selective Hierarchical Data Selection for Instruction Tuning
Yanjun Fu, Faisal Hamman, Sanghamitra Dutta
Abstract
Instruction tuning is essential for Large Language Models (LLMs) to effectively follow user instructions. To improve training efficiency and reduce data redundancy, recent works use LLM-based scoring functions, e.g., Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD), to select high-quality instruction-tuning data with scores above a threshold. While these data selection methods often lead to models that can match or even exceed the performance of models trained on the full datasets, we identify two key limitations: (i) they assess quality at the sample level, ignoring token-level informativeness; and (ii) they overlook the robustness of the scoring method, often selecting a sample due to superficial lexical features instead of its true quality. In this work, we propose Token-Selective HIeRarchical Data Selection for Instruction Tuning (T-SHIRT), a novel data selection framework that introduces a new scoring method to include only informative tokens in quality evaluation and also promotes robust and reliable samples whose neighbors also show high quality with less local inconsistencies. We demonstrate that models instruction-tuned on a curated dataset (only 5% of the original size) using T-SHIRT can outperform those trained on the entire large-scale dataset by up to 5.48 points on average across eight benchmarks. Across various LLMs and training set scales, our method consistently surpasses existing state-of-the-art data selection techniques, while also remaining both cost-effective and highly efficient. For instance, by using GPT-2 for score computation, we are able to process a dataset of 52k samples in 40 minutes on a single GPU. Our code is available at https://github.com/Dynamite321/T-SHIRT.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 847163b1-2cd8-4997-8a00-7215d0df2048Cited by top-tier papers5
- SelecTKD: Selective Token-Weighted Knowledge Distillation for LLMsHaiduo Huang, Jiangcheng Song, Yadong Zhang, Pengju RenCVPR 2026 · 18 citations
- ssToken: Self-modulated and Semantic-aware Token Selection for LLM Fine-tuningXiaohan Qin, Victor Wang, Ning Liao, Cancheng Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- SFTMix: Elevating Language Model Instruction Tuning with Mixup RecipeYuxin Xiao, Shujian Zhang, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Wenxuan ZhouACL 2026 · 3 citations
- TRIM: Token-wise Attention-Derived Saliency for Data-Efficient Instruction TuningManish Nagaraj, Sakshi Choudhary, Utkarsh Saxena, Deepak Ravikumar et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Cure-SFT: Diagnostic-Guided Data Curation for Instruction TuningYuankang Fu, Xinrong Gong, Chen Gong, Tong Zhang et al.ICML 2026
Builds on29
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,486 citations
Related papers
- Importance-Aware Data Selection for Efficient LLM Instruction TuningTingyu Jiang, Shen Li, Yiyao Song, Lan Zhang et al.AAAI 2026 · 5 citations
- From Selection to Refinement: Iterative Optimization for Instruction DataHang Hu, Ziyan Liu, Rujie Wen, Ruihui Hou et al.ACL 2026
- SelectIT: Selective Instruction Tuning for LLMs via Uncertainty-Aware Self-ReflectionLiangxin Liu, Xuebo Liu, Derek F. Wong, Dongfang Li et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 49 citations
- What Makes Good Instruction-Tuning Data? An In-Context Learning PerspectiveGuangzeng Han, Xiaolei HuangACL 2026 · 1 citation
- What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction TuningWei Liu, Weihao Zeng, Keqing He, Yong Jiang et al.ICLR 2024 · 369 citations
