From Selection to Refinement: Iterative Optimization for Instruction Data
Hang Hu, Ziyan Liu, Rujie Wen, Ruihui Hou, Xueyan Wu, Mu Zhang, Jianxing Yu, Tong Ruan, Jingping Liu
Abstract
Instruction tuning plays a crucial role in enhancing large language models (LLMs) to better understand complex user instructions. While various data selection and revision methods have been explored to optimize instruction tuning datasets, they face two main challenges: unreasonable pruning of potentially valuable low-quality data and the persistence of noise or semantic drift during revision. To address these issues, we propose a novel automated iterative framework for instruction data optimization. Our framework introduces Instruction Quality Differentiation to identify valuable high-quality and low-quality data across multiple dimensions. For low-quality data, we propose a Feedback-driven Iterative Refinement mechanism with an "evaluate-refine-review" process and design an Output Alignment module to improve data quality. Experiments on seven public benchmark datasets show that our framework outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving 2.09% and 2.60% improvements on the Alpaca and Dolly datasets, respectively, with high data efficiency. Our code and data are available at the anonymous link https: //github.com/surihuhang/From-Selecti on-to-Refinement--Iterative-Optimiz ation-for-Instruction-Data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on16
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- WizardLM: Empowering Large Pre-Trained Language Models to Follow Complex InstructionsCan Xu, Qingfeng Sun, Kai Zheng, Xiubo Geng et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,206 citations
- Large Language Models can Accurately Predict Searcher PreferencesPaul Thomas, Seth Spielman, Nick Craswell, Bhaskar MitraSIGIR 2024 · 153 citations
- #InsTag: Instruction Tagging for Analyzing Supervised Fine-tuning of Large Language ModelsKeming Lu, Hongyi Yuan, Zheng Yuan, Runji Lin et al.ICLR 2024 · 119 citations
- Understanding Emergent Abilities of Language Models from the Loss PerspectiveZhengxiao Du, Aohan Zeng, Yuxiao Dong, Jie TangNeurIPS 2024 · 113 citations
Related papers
- SelectIT: Selective Instruction Tuning for LLMs via Uncertainty-Aware Self-ReflectionLiangxin Liu, Xuebo Liu, Derek F. Wong, Dongfang Li et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 49 citations
- MAIN: Mutual Alignment Is Necessary for instruction tuningFanyi Yang, Jianfeng Liu, Xin Zhang, Haoyu Liu et al.EMNLP 2025
- What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction TuningWei Liu, Weihao Zeng, Keqing He, Yong Jiang et al.ICLR 2024 · 369 citations
- Priority on High-Quality: Selecting Instruction Data via Consistency Verification of Noise InjectionHong Zhang, Feng Zhao, Ruilin Zhao, Cheng Yan et al.EMNLP 2025
- T-SHIRT: Token-Selective Hierarchical Data Selection for Instruction TuningYanjun Fu, Faisal Hamman, Sanghamitra DuttaNeurIPS 2025 · 15 citations
