Priority on High-Quality: Selecting Instruction Data via Consistency Verification of Noise Injection
Hong Zhang, Feng Zhao, Ruilin Zhao, Cheng Yan, Kangzheng Liu
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated a remarkable understanding of language nuances through instruction tuning, enabling them to effectively tackle various natural language processing tasks. Recent research has focused on the quality of instruction data rather than the quantity of instructions. However, existing high-quality instruction selection methods rely on external models or rules, overlooking the intrinsic association between pretrained model and instruction data, making it difficult to select data that align with the preferences of pre-trained model. To address this challenge, we propose a strategy that utilizes noise injection to identify the quality of instruction data, without relying on external model. We also implement the strategy of combining inter-class diversity and intra-class diversity to improve model performance. The experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms the model trained on the entire dataset and established baselines. Our study provides a new perspective on noise injection in the field of instruction tuning, and also illustrates that the pre-trained model itself should be considered in defining high-quality. Additionally, we publish our selected highquality instruction data at https://github. com/HUSTNLP-codes/Alpaca-selectd .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on8
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,486 citations
- The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction TuningShayne Longpre, Le Hou, Tu Vu, Albert Webson et al.ICML 2023 · 908 citations
- AlpaGasus: Training a Better Alpaca with Fewer DataLichang Chen, Shiyang Li, Jun Yan, Hai Wang et al.ICLR 2024 · 295 citations
- Self-Alignment with Instruction BacktranslationXian Li, Ping Yu, Chunting Zhou, Timo Schick et al.ICLR 2024 · 174 citations
Related papers
- From Selection to Refinement: Iterative Optimization for Instruction DataHang Hu, Ziyan Liu, Rujie Wen, Ruihui Hou et al.ACL 2026
- SelectIT: Selective Instruction Tuning for LLMs via Uncertainty-Aware Self-ReflectionLiangxin Liu, Xuebo Liu, Derek F. Wong, Dongfang Li et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 49 citations
- Enhancing NLU in Large Language Models Using Adversarial Noisy Instruction TuningShengyuan Bai, Qibin Li, Zhe Wang, Nai Zhou et al.AAAI 2025 · 6 citations
- What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction TuningWei Liu, Weihao Zeng, Keqing He, Yong Jiang et al.ICLR 2024 · 369 citations
- CPQS-Tuning: A Model Self-Perception-Based Data Filtering Algorithm for Efficient Instruction Fine-TuningYI Ren, Yanhui Li, Tianyi Zhang, Diandong LiuICLR 2026
