A Benchmark for Semantic Sensitive Information in LLMs Outputs
Qingjie Zhang, Han Qiu, Di Wang, Yiming Li, Tianwei Zhang, Wenyu Zhu, Haiqin Weng, Liu Yan, Chao Zhang
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) can output sensitive information, which has emerged as a novel safety concern. Previous works focus on structured sensitive information (e.g. personal identifiable information). However, we notice that sensitive information can also be at semantic level, i.e. semantic sensitive information (SemSI). Particularly, simple natural questions can let state-of-the-art (SOTA) LLMs output SemSI. Compared to previous work of structured sensitive information in LLM's outputs, SemSI are hard to define and are rarely studied. Therefore, we propose a novel and large-scale investigation on the existence of SemSI in SOTA LLMs induced by simple natural questions. First, we construct a comprehensive and labeled dataset of semantic sensitive information, SemSI-Set, by including three typical categories of SemSI. Then, we propose a large-scale benchmark, SemSI-Bench, to systematically evaluate semantic sensitive information in 25 SOTA LLMs. Our finding reveals that SemSI widely exists in SOTA LLMs' outputs by querying with simple natural questions. We open-source our project at https://semsi-project.github.io/ .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Privasis: Synthesizing the Largest "Public" Private Dataset from ScratchHyunwoo Kim, Niloofar Mireshghallah, Michael Duan, Rui Xin et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- RedacBench: Can AI Erase Your Secrets?Hyunjun Jeon, Kyuyoung Kim, Jinwoo ShinICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- ObCLIP: Oblivious CLoud-Device Hybrid Image Generation with Privacy PreservationHaoqi Wu, Wei Dai, Ming Xu, Li Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025
Builds on20
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
Related papers
- SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Large Language ModelsZhexin Zhang, Leqi Lei, Lindong Wu, Rui Sun et al.ACL 2024
- PII-Bench: Evaluating Query-Aware Privacy Protection SystemsHao Shen, Zhouhong Gu, Haokai Hong, Weili Han et al.ACL 2026
- Investigating How Pre-training Data Leakage Affects Models' Reproduction and Detection CapabilitiesMasahiro Kaneko, Timothy BaldwinEMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- SafeText: A Benchmark for Exploring Physical Safety in Language ModelsSharon Levy, Emily Allaway, Melanie Subbiah, Lydia B. Chilton et al.EMNLP 2022 · 14 citations
- USB: A Comprehensive and Unified Safety Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language ModelsBaolin Zheng, Guanlin Chen, Qingyang Teng, Hongqiong Zhong et al.ACL 2026 · 10 citations
