Lune

ACL2026Top-tier venue

USB: A Comprehensive and Unified Safety Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models

Baolin Zheng, Guanlin Chen, Qingyang Teng, Hongqiong Zhong, Yingshui Tan, Zhendong Liu, Weixun Wang, Jiaheng Liu, Jian Yang, Huiyun Jing, Jincheng Wei, Wenbo Su

2026Year
10Citations
8Top-tier citations

Abstract

Despite their remarkable achievements and widespread adoption, Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have revealed significant security vulnerabilities, highlighting the urgent need for robust safety evaluation benchmarks. Existing MLLM safety benchmarks, however, fall short in terms of data quality and coverge, and modal risk combinations, resulting in inflated and contradictory evaluation results, which hinders the discovery and governance of security concerns. Besides, we argue that vulnerabilities to harmful queries and oversensitivity to harmless ones should to be considered simultaneously in MLLMs safety evaluation, whereas these were previously considered separately. In this paper, to address these shortcomings, we introduce Unified Safety Benchmarks (USB), which is one of the most comprehensive evaluation benchmarks in MLLM safety. Our benchmark features high-quality queries, extensive risk categories, comprehensive modal combinations, and encompasses both vulnerability and oversensitivity evaluations. From the perspective of two key dimensions: risk categories and modality combinations, we demonstrate that the available benchmarks-even the union of the vast majority of them-are far from being truly comprehensive. To bridge this gap, we design a sophisticated data synthesis pipeline that generates extensive, high-quality complementary data addressing previously unexplored aspects. By combining open-source datasets with our synthetic data, our benchmark provides 4 distinct modality combinations for each of the 61 risk sub-categories, covering both English and Chinese across both vulnerability and oversensitivity dimensions. Extensive experimental result, conducted across 12 mainstream open-source MLLMs and 5 closed-source commercial MLLMs, demonstrates that existing MLLMs still struggle with trade-off between avoiding vulnerabilities and oversensitivity, and are more vulnerable to image-only risky or cross-modal risky inputs, highlighting the need for refined safety mechanisms. 1 Warning: This paper contains unfiltered and potentially harmful content that may be offensive.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext ce59336f-24ef-40ef-8463-efd240891bad

Cited by top-tier papers8

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on18

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines