PII-Bench: Evaluating Query-Aware Privacy Protection Systems
Hao Shen, Zhouhong Gu, Haokai Hong, Weili Han, Hongfeng Chai
Abstract
The widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) has raised significant privacy concerns regarding the exposure of personally identifiable information (PII) in user prompts. To address this challenge, we propose a queryunrelated PII masking strategy and introduce PII-Bench, the first comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing privacy protection systems. PII-Bench comprises 2,842 test samples across 7 PII types with 55 fine-grained subcategories, featuring diverse scenarios from singlesubject descriptions to complex multi-party interactions. Each sample is carefully crafted with a user query, context description, and standard answer indicating query-relevant PII. Our empirical evaluation reveals that while current models perform adequately in basic PII detection, they show significant limitations in determining PII query relevance. Even advanced LLMs struggle with this task, particularly in handling complex multi-subject scenarios, indicating substantial room for improvement in achieving intelligent PII masking.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 984726cc-71dc-45a9-8989-c2497051bfb7Cited by top-tier papers2
- Subject-level Inference for Realistic Text Anonymization EvaluationMyeong Seok Oh, Dong-Yun Kim, Hanseok Oh, Chaean Kang et al.ACL 2026
- MINIM: Privacy-Aware Minimal View for Agents via Trusted Local SanitizationHexuan Yu, Chaoyu Zhang, Heng Jin, Shanghao Shi et al.ICML 2026
Builds on5
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language ModelsLei Wang, Wanyu Xu, Yihuai Lan, Zhiqiang Hu et al.ACL 2023 · 249 citations
- LLM-PBE: Assessing Data Privacy in Large Language ModelsQinbin Li, Junyuan Hong, Chulin Xie, Jeffrey Tan et al.VLDB 2024 · 66 citations
- Analyzing Leakage of Personally Identifiable Information in Language ModelsNils Lukas, Ahmed Salem, Robert Sim, Shruti Tople et al.S&P 2023
Related papers
- PrivaCI-Bench: Evaluating Privacy with Contextual Integrity and Legal ComplianceHaoran Li, Wenbin Hu, Huihao Jing, Yulin Chen et al.ACL 2025
- A Benchmark for Semantic Sensitive Information in LLMs OutputsQingjie Zhang, Han Qiu, Di Wang, Yiming Li et al.ICLR 2025
- RedacBench: Can AI Erase Your Secrets?Hyunjun Jeon, Kyuyoung Kim, Jinwoo ShinICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- User Perceptions vs. Proxy LLM Judges: Privacy and Helpfulness in LLM Responses to Privacy-Sensitive ScenariosXiaoyuan Wu, Roshni Kaushik, Wenkai Li, Lujo Bauer et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Large Language ModelsZhexin Zhang, Leqi Lei, Lindong Wu, Rui Sun et al.ACL 2024
