Don't Just Tell Me, Ask Me: AI Systems that Intelligently Frame Explanations as Questions Improve Human Logical Discernment Accuracy over Causal AI explanations
Valdemar Danry, Pat Pataranutaporn, Yaoli Mao, Pattie Maes
Abstract
Critical thinking is an essential human skill. Despite the importance of critical thinking, research reveals that our reasoning ability suffers from personal biases and cognitive resource limitations, leading to potentially dangerous outcomes. This paper presents the novel idea of AI-framed Questioning that turns information relevant to the AI classification into questions to actively engage users’ thinking and scaffold their reasoning process. We conducted a study with 204 participants comparing the effects of AI-framed Questioning on a critical thinking task; discernment of logical validity of socially divisive statements. Our results show that compared to no feedback and even causal AI explanations of an always correct system, AI-framed Questioning significantly increase human discernment of logically flawed statements. Our experiment exemplifies a future style of Human-AI co-reasoning system, where the AI becomes a critical thinking stimulator rather than an information teller.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get e2ff6339-979f-4792-9caf-766185d42e50Cited by top-tier papers27
- The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge WorkersHao-Ping (Hank) Lee, Advait Sarkar, Lev Tankelevitch, Ian Drosos et al.CHI 2025 · 690 citations
- Towards Human-AI Deliberation: Design and Evaluation of LLM-Empowered Deliberative AI for AI-Assisted Decision-MakingShuai Ma, Qiaoyi Chen, Xinru Wang, Chengbo Zheng et al.CHI 2025 · 113 citations
- Cognitive Forcing for Better Decision-Making: Reducing Overreliance on AI Systems Through Partial ExplanationsSander de Jong, Ville Paananen, Benjamin Tag, Niels van BerkelCSCW 2025 · 32 citations
- Contrastive Explanations That Anticipate Human Misconceptions Can Improve Human Decision-Making SkillsZana Buçinca, Siddharth Swaroop, Amanda E. Paluch, Finale Doshi-Velez et al.CHI 2025 · 31 citations
- Dango: A Mixed-Initiative Data Wrangling System using Large Language ModelWei-Hao Chen, Weixi Tong, Amanda Case, Tianyi ZhangCHI 2025 · 19 citations
Related papers
- Beyond Passive Critical Thinking: Fostering Proactive Questioning to Enhance Human-AI CollaborationAnte Wang, Yujie Lin, Jingyao Liu, Suhang Wu et al.AAAI 2026 · 3 citations
- DialDefer: A Framework for Detecting and Mitigating LLM Dialogic DeferenceParisa Rabbani, Priyam Sahoo, Ruben Mathew, Aishee Mondal et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Deceptive Explanations by Large Language Models Lead People to Change their Beliefs About Misinformation More Often than Honest ExplanationsValdemar Danry, Pat Pataranutaporn, Matthew Groh, Ziv EpsteinCHI 2025 · 32 citations
- Designing Scaffolding Cards to Facilitate LLM-Based Socratic Instruction: An Exploratory Study of Response Strategies to Support LearningLujin Mao, Linyuan Dong, Wenan Li, Xiangen Hu et al.CHI 2026 · 3 citations
- AMQuestioner: Training Critical Thinking with Question-Driven Interactive Argument Maps in Online DiscussionQiyu Pan, Jianqiao Zeng, Jie Wang, Junyu Liu et al.CSCW 2025 · 1 citation
